Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": You are usually not in charge.
Explanation:
Wage-earners are the people who live mainly thanks to the salary they receive. Under this category fall low-range workers whose base income is their source of income. Hardly ever low-range employees are assigned major tasks since they are subordinates, so the success or failure of a project does not rely directly on them since they are not the ones in charge.
Answer: The following is not considered when you are calculating cost of quality:<u><em> The cost of gaining formal acceptance of project deliverable.</em></u>
Cost of Quality contains all the costs that are both internal and external to the system; whereas, the Cost of Quality include the conformance, considering any costs connected with both appraisal and interference.
Cost of Quality is calculated as :
Cost of Quality = Cost of Poor Quality + Cost of Good Quality
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Based on the given details of the conversation that transpired between Katie Simpson and Carl Mendoza we can vividly say that the preceding IM transcript apply professional best practices reason been that Katie Simpson who is the caller went straight to point to the main reason why she called the receiver which is Carl Mendoza, And during the course of the preceding TRANSCRIPT the proper use of grammers and words , spelling, full stop, exclamation mark and question mark were on point and accurate.
