Assertions are strong statements which provide strong fact. Rhetoric theory is one which checks the available persuasions for the statement and the validates the claiming statement.
As given that non formal institutions have no role to play at processing stage of system theory, this statement has no valid supporting evidence.
The validity of this statement is questioned and therefore readers will have no evidence to accept this statement. The readers will think differently and assertion made is not accepted by the readers.
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24358664
I believe the answer is: <span>speak out in public on issues
</span>
Both of them were well known leaders during W<span>omen's suffrage movement. At that time, women's voice were unheard and pressed down by society.
But both of them were brave enough to stand up and fight for women's right and the establishment of slavery.</span>
Answer:According to the interactionist view,A) skin color often triggers negative responses about busing, crime, housing, jobs, and poverty
Explanation: According to symbolic interactionists , symbols which are used as a form of identifying each race are actual responsible for racism rather than race itself. These symbols such as skin colour triggers racism.
According to historical perspective, Henry Grady was referred to as "The voice of the new south" because <u>he assisted in reintegrating the states of the Confederacy into the Union after the American Civil War.</u>
Henry Grady was famous for being an American Journalist and Orator.
Following the end of the American Civil war in 1865, Henry Grady was known to have persuaded the Northerners about the South’s capacity to be the industrial hub.
He was known to have encouraged industrialization of the south, beginning with the International Cotton Exposition.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Henry Grady took an active role in the industrialization of the Southern part of the United States.
Learn more about Henry Grady here: brainly.com/question/3518285
Answer:
c. There was no change in the person in responsible charge.
Explanation:
There was no change based on the fragment in the question. The CFO was simply fulfilling his obligation as the responsible by the finances in the corporation by pointing out that the project was over the budget limit and asked for steps to be taken to return to initial plan.