Answer:
America used to be a place of slavery where only white men ruled and women and blacks, asians, mexicans, etc. were considered lesser and were forced into submission. In our current society things are change to where all are considered equal and there are laws against people being segregated from working or being in places of power, it even encourages women and blacks into higher society places. but still our world isn't perfect and people still dont want women presidents and others still want to eradicate blacks from our society.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Group polarization.
Explanation:
Group polarization is a phenomenon widely studied in Social Psychology and can be understood as the tendency of groups to engage in behavior, make decisions, or adopt attitudes that are more radical and more extreme than the initial attitudes and behavior of their initial individual members.
Usually after a discussion with his/her group, an individual attitude towards certain topic tend to get reinforced and made more radical.
In this particular case, after discussing the matter over coffee, they are even more convinced that obtaining a degree is easier today. This episode provides an example of: Group polarization.
Answer:
That statement is false
Explanation:
During the industrial revolution, laws regarding worker's right and union's right haven't been properly established.
so, when the business owners see some sort of strike within their properties, they have the right to ask police's helped to forcefully remove these protesters from the proximity. This often caused violent clashes during the strikes.
Answer:
put more emphasis on interpersonal relationships.
Explanation:
Hello! Many of Freud's followers who have identified with part of his legacy have instead emphasized the cultural and social area, interpersonal relationships or have paid more attention to the experiences and circumstances that were given at that time for the patient.
Thanks for your question!
Answer:
Judicial activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is a situation whereby Judges may interpret the Constitution to their taste, adapting it to modern situations: award rights, make other branches take action, Prescribing rather than proscribe.it is based on the philosophy of judicial decision-making as judges allow, mainly, their personal views about public policy to guide and help in their decisions making or taking. In it, the flexibility of the Constitution is inadequate.
In this philosophy, Court can go beyond the words of the Constitution e.g judge can use his own personal intuition or views or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
