Answer: Smith—permissive; Jones—authoritarian; Johnson—rejecting-neglecting
Explanation: The Smith's are lenient. They don't expect much from their children but they shower all the love and care for their children. This is an example of permissive parenting.
The Jones's are authoritarian. This is just an opposite of permissive parenting. They expect much but show less care.
The Johnson's are rejecting-neglecting. They don't expect anything from the kids and they don't care either.
The concept that Marsiglia and Kulis are referring to from the statement mentioned in the question is a term called intersectionality.
Intersectionality is a concept that is generally defined as <em>a framework that acknowledges how an individual is impacted by various systems of power – and his or her position in each system, when combined would create a different experience in how an individual would be treated by the society at large. </em>
For example, an individual who identifies as Black, is female, has an upper middle class income, is heterosexual would navigate life differently from someone who is White, male, has a lower class income, and is homosexual.
<span>In Nazi, Germany they were enforced ghettos. Jewish people were forced to move into them to be kept separate from the general population and make them an easier target since they were already isolated from others. In the US, ghettos emerged because when people emigrated to the US they had a tendency to settle down among their own ethnicity, so the ghettos sprang up from that.</span>
We have restricted the range of the variables, is most likely the reason responsible for this result
A restricted range is a compacted or shorter range of values. Correlations are influenced by limited ranges. The correlation coefficient actually decreases as the range is constrained, which is a strange phenomena. as an illustration The connection between waist measurement and BMI was found to be quite strong (r = 0.85) in a study of diabetes patients.
For various narrow ranges, the correlation, however, varied. The association coefficient was 0.86 when the BMI range was limited to those over 35. Almost little association was found for BMIs between 30 and 35. (-0.09). However, the correlation coefficient tended to decrease over time over constrained ranges.
To learn more about restricted range here,
brainly.com/question/3653294
#SPJ4
