Answer:
In 2009, the U.S. government imposed a 35% tariff on tires imported from China. (The numbers and equations used here are simplified based on the results of a much more complicated model.) Demand is given by QD = 105 − 1.5P where QD is in millions of tires per year. Supply is QS = 1.5873P − 15.87.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Kim will win, because the bonus is a reward for work they have already performed, which is past consideration and cannot be used to create a contract.
Explanation:
In order for a contract to be enforceable, consideration must be exchanged between both parties. In this case, Kim made a promise that included consideration ($3,500) but Gold didn't exchange of give anything back. The swimming pool is already finished and it represents another different contract.
Another example would be a boss telling a subordinate that he/she will receive a bonus for having worked 10 years in the firm. The employee already got paid for working the 10 years, so there is no actual exchange of new consideration.
Answer:
Ethical
Explanation:
The ethical dilemma means the uncertainties form that developed due to violation of the moral standard that would be held in our life
It would be considered right when she tells to the client regrading the mice problem but she is discouraged as she know that if she do this than she would mess up with the sales that decrease the salary
So this given situation represent an ethical dilemma
