1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nataly862011 [7]
2 years ago
7

Define scalar quantity​

Physics
2 answers:
joja [24]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Scalar quantities are physical quantities which have a magnitude and direction.

e.g. in 5 km, 5 is the magnitude(number) and km is the unit.

some scalar quantities are mass, length, distance, speed, power, energy, temperature etc.

Alekssandra [29.7K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: Values with magnitude but without direction

Explanation:

Majorly there exists two types of quantities, Scalar and Vector.

Vectors: Quantities, with magnitude and direction.

Example: Force, Displacement

Scalars: Quantities, with magnitude but without direction.

Example: Weight, Length, Quantity

we do not need direction to define weight,

it is just 5 kilograms, and NOT 5 kilograms towards east.

You might be interested in
A device for acclimating military pilots to the high accelerations they must experience consists of a horizontal beam that rotat
slava [35]

Answer: the angular frequency is 2.31 rad/s

Explanation:

The data we have is:

Radial acceleration A = 27.9 m/s^2

Beam length r = 5.21m

The radial acceleration is equal to the velocity square divided the radius of the circle (the lenght of the beam in this case)

And we can write the velocity as:

v = w*r where r is the radius of the circle, and w is the angular frequency.

w = 2pi*f

where f is the "normal" frequency.

So we have:

A = (v^2)/r = (r*w)^2/r = r*w^2

We can replace the values and find w.

27.9m/s^2 = 5.21m*w^2

√(27.9/5.21) = w = 2.31 rad/s

8 0
3 years ago
I have an algerbra 2 question.
Andreyy89

In order to find out if the exponential function represents a growth or a decay, let's look at the number that is base to the exponent x.

If the number is greater than 1, so the function represents a growth, and if the number is less than 1, the function represents a decay.

Since the number is 1.075, the function represents a growth.

To find the % increase, first let's convert the number to percentage, and then subtract 100%:

\begin{gathered} 1.075=1.075\cdot100\text{\%}=107.5\text{\%} \\ 107.5\text{\%}-100\text{\%}=7.5\text{\%} \end{gathered}

So the percent increase is 7.5%.

7 0
1 year ago
What is the magnitude of a point charge in coulombs whose electric field 51 cm away has the magnitude 2.5 n/c?
Tema [17]

The magnitude of a point charge is 0.189 x 10⁻⁹C.

<h3>Steps</h3>

We have stated that the point charge's electric field is E=2.5 N/C.

Distance from point charge R = 51 cm = 0.51 m

We are aware that the electric field resulting from a point charge is given as E = 1 / 4π∈₀ × Q / R²

so 2.5 = 9 x 10⁹ Q/ 0.68²

The magnitude of a point charge is 0.189 x 10⁻⁹C.

The electric force per unit charge is referred to as the electric field. It is assumed that the field's direction corresponds to the force it would apply to a positive test charge.

From a positive point charge, the electric field radiates outward, and from a negative point charge, it radiates in.

learn more about electric field here

brainly.com/question/14372859

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
A 5.50 kg sled is initially at rest on a frictionless horizontal road. The sled is pulled a distance of 3.20 m by a force of 25.
kiruha [24]

(a) 69.3 J

The work done by the applied force is given by:

W=Fd cos \theta

where:

F = 25.0 N is the magnitude of the applied force

d = 3.20 m is the displacement of the sled

\theta=30^{\circ} is the angle between the direction of the force and the displacement of the sled

Substituting numbers into the formula, we find

W=(25.0 N)(3.20 m)(cos 30^{\circ})=69.3 J

(b) 0

The problem says that the surface is frictionless: this means that no friction is acting on the sled, therefore the energy dissipated by friction must be zero.

(c) 69.3 J

According to the work-energy theorem, the work done by the applied force is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the sled:

\Delta K = W

where

\Delta K is the change in kinetic energy

W is the work done

Since we already calculated W in part (a):

W = 69.3 J

We therefore know that the change in kinetic energy of the sled is equal to this value:

\Delta K=69.3 J

(d) 4.9 m/s

The change in kinetic energy of the sled can be rewritten as:

\Delta K=K_f - K_i = \frac{1}{2}mv^2-\frac{1}{2}mu^2 (1)

where

Kf is the final kinetic energy

Ki is the initial kinetic energy

m = 5.50 kg is the mass of the sled

u = 0 is the initial speed of the sled

v = ? is the final speed of the sled

We can calculate the variation of kinetic energy of the sled, \Delta K, after it has travelled for d=3 m. Using the work-energy theorem again, we find

\Delta K= W = Fd cos \theta =(25.0 N)(3.0 m)(cos 30^{\circ})=65.0 J

And substituting into (1) and re-arrangin the equation, we find

v=\sqrt{\frac{2 \Delta K}{m}}=\sqrt{\frac{2(65.0 J)}{5.50 kg}}=4.9 m/s

6 0
4 years ago
If 745-nm and 660-nm light passes through two slits 0.54 mm apart, how far apart are the second-order fringes for these two wave
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

0.82 mm

Explanation:

The formula for calculation an n^{th} bright fringe from the central maxima is given as:

y_n=\frac{n \lambda D}{d}

so for the distance of the second-order fringe when wavelength \lambda_1 = 745-nm can be calculated as:

y_2 = \frac{n \lambda_1 D}{d}

where;

n = 2

\lambda_1 = 745-nm

D = 1.0 m

d = 0.54 mm

substituting the parameters in the above equation; we have:

y_2 = \frac{2(745nm*\frac{10^{-9m}}{1.0nm}(1.0m) }{0.54 (\frac{10^{-3m}} {1.0mm})}

y_2 = 0.00276 m

y_2 = 2.76 × 10 ⁻³ m

The distance of the second order fringe when the wavelength \lambda_2 = 660-nm is as follows:

y^'}_2 = \frac{2(660nm*\frac{10^{-9m}}{1.0nm}(1.0m) }{0.54 (\frac{10^{-3m}} {1.0mm})}

y^'}_2 = 1.94 × 10 ⁻³ m

So, the distance apart the two fringe can now be calculated as:

\delta y = y_2-y^{'}_2

\delta y = 2.76 × 10 ⁻³ m - 1.94 × 10 ⁻³ m

\delta y = 10 ⁻³ (2.76 - 1.94)

\delta y = 10 ⁻³ (0.82)

\delta y = 0.82 × 10 ⁻³ m

\delta y =  0.82 × 10 ⁻³ m (\frac{1.0mm}{10^{-3}m} )

\delta y = 0.82 mm

Thus, the distance apart the second-order fringes for these two wavelengths = 0.82 mm

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 8. There are different characteristics for each of the states of matter. Which statement
    11·1 answer
  • You slide a slab of dielectric between the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor. As you do this, the potential difference betwee
    6·1 answer
  • If a ball is thrown upward, how fast would it have to be thrown to reach a maximum height of 29m? How long was the ball in the a
    14·1 answer
  • Someone please help me
    13·1 answer
  • How is the average velocity of this object related to its initial and final velocities?
    6·1 answer
  • The dimensions of a room are 16.40 m long, 4.5 m wide and 3.26 m high. What is the volume of the room in cubic meters? Express y
    9·1 answer
  • You swing your golf club such that it hits a ball with a force of 15 newtons. It makes contact with the ball for a distance of 0
    6·1 answer
  • If a town was 90 miles away and you travel at 45 mph how long would it take to get there
    10·1 answer
  • 23
    6·1 answer
  • How to determine the center of gravity of a lamina​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!