1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
1 year ago
13

Why is it necessary to collimate the light source before using the prism to disperse the light?.

Physics
1 answer:
Sergeu [11.5K]1 year ago
5 0

The reason to collimate the light source before utilizing the prism is that if white light enters the prism at various angles, some blue light will exit the prism at the same angle.

Prisms' Dispersion of Light. When light source travels through a triangular prism, these hues are frequently seen. The prism separates the white light source divided into its individual colors, which are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet. Dispersion is the process through which visible light is divided into its various colors.

Since blue light has a shorter wavelength than red light and refracts more than the latter, it is bent more when white light enters a prism than red light.

Learn more about light source here

brainly.com/question/14459326

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Does 3.60 x 10 ⁻² have 2 significant figures
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

Number of Significant Figures: 2

The Significant Figures are 3 6

Explanation:

= 3.60 × 102

(scientific notation)

= 3.60e2

(scientific e notation)

= 360 × 100

(engineering notation)

(one)

= 360

(real number)

4 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know the answer to all of these questions
Rasek [7]

Answer:

i don't understand the hw

5 0
3 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
Lauren throws her first pitch of the season for her school's softball team. If the ball travels 80 feet and takes 1.58 seconds t
kow [346]

Answer:

<em><u>5</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>6</u></em><em><u>3</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>f</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>/</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>(</u></em><em><u>2</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>)</u></em>

Explanation:

Speed = Distance/Time

80/1.58 = 50.63291139

= <u>50.63</u><u> </u><u>f</u><u>t</u><u>/</u><u>s</u> (2dp)

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP TIMED
Igoryamba

Radio waves have longer wavelengths and lower frequencies than microwaves.

infrared is longer wavelengths and lower frequencies than UV light

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A rocket takes off from Earth and reaches a speed of 105 m/s in 18.0 s. If the exhaust speed is 1,200 m/sand the mass of fuel bu
    13·1 answer
  • 2. Describe what would happen to both air temperature and soil temperature if cold weather were to pass through the area.
    15·1 answer
  • What makes astronomers think that impact rates for the Moon must have been higher earlier than 3.8 billion years ago?
    15·1 answer
  • Let’s allow ourselves to be a little more optimistic with our bus passengers. Earlier in the movie Sandy has to make the bus jum
    13·1 answer
  • How does the density of the Earth’s core compare to the other layers of the Earth?
    13·2 answers
  • The pitch of a sound is most closely related to the what
    5·1 answer
  • What can electricty from solar power be used for​
    14·1 answer
  • The answer is A and no matter how many times I tried I can't get it.
    10·1 answer
  • Tính hiệu suất nhiệt của động cơ nhiệt biết nhiệt lượng ở nguồn nóng 420,4kJ/kg và nhiệt lượng ở nguồn lạnh 218kJ/kg.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the wave where the oscillation is perpendicular to the direction<br> of motion.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!