Ask question

Ask question

All categories

1 year ago

13

Can someone please help me

1 answer:

DedPeter [7]1 year ago

5 0

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter = 2l + 2w

48 = 2(18) + 2(w)

48 = 36 + 2w

12 = 2w

w = 6

<em>Could you please give me brainliest for this? Thank you!</em>

You might be interested in

Describe the credit process, using five vocabulary terms from the chapter.

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

The answer is a and e

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Find the percent of change. Round to the nearest percent.

katovenus [111]

Answer:

<u> -54.5%</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

You will have to use this formula

$\frac{new value-oldvalue}{oldvalue}$

When substituted in you have $\frac{30-66}{66}$

30-66=-36

-36/66= -0.54 (54 repeating)

Then you have to convert this into a percentage, -54.54(repeating) percent

To the nearest hundredth you would round down to<u> -54.5%</u>.

It is a Decrease because it is negatated.

8 0

3 years ago

Instructions: Use the ratio of a 30-60-90 triangle to solve for the variables.

Pepsi [2]

Answer:

$x=20$

$y=10\,\sqrt{3}$

Step-by-step explanation:

In the triangle we have the following trigonometric equations:

$tan(60^o)=\frac{opposite}{adjacent} \\\sqrt{3} =\frac{y}{10} \\y=10\,\sqrt{3}$

and also:

$cos(60^o)=\frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse}\\\frac{1}{2} =\frac{10}{x}\\x=20$

8 0

3 years ago

The population of deer in a state park can be predicted by the expression 106(1.087)t, where t is the number of years since 2010

Arturiano [62]

Answer:

b) When will the number of deer be 600?

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

4 years ago

The USDA conducted tests for salmonella in produce grown in California. In an independent sample of 252 cultures obtained from w

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 252$

The number that tested positive is $k_1 = 18$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 476$

The number that tested positive is $k_2 = 20$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

Generally the first sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _1 = \frac{k_1 }{ n_1 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = \frac{18 }{ 252 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = 0.071$

Generally the second sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _2 = \frac{k_2 }{ n_2 }$

=> $\^ p _2 = \frac{20 }{ 476}$

=> $\^ p _2 = 0.042$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 - p_2 = 0$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 - p_2 \ne 0$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented

$z = \frac{ \^ p_1 - \^ p_2 - ( p_ 1 - p_2 )}{ \sqrt{\frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^ p_1)}{ n_1 } + \frac{\^ p_2 (1-\^ p_2)}{ n_2 } } }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.071 - 0.042 - 0 }{ \sqrt{\frac{0.071 (1-0.071)}{ 252 } + \frac{0.042 (1-\^ 0.042)}{ 476 } } }$

=> $z = 1.56$

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the right corresponding to 1.56 is

$P(Z > 1.56 ) =0.05938$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 * P(Z > 1.56 )$

=> $p-value = 2 * 0.05938$

=> $p-value = 0.1188$

From the value obtained we see that $p-value > \alpha$ hence

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

5 0

3 years ago