Answer:
d. beta did a better job of explaining the returns than standard deviation
Explanation:
Beta measures the systemic risk associated with the particular investment, it do not compute the total risk associated, which is more logical.
Standard deviation computes the total risk associated.
Some risk is natural, like the risk of floods, natural calamities, earthquake, etc:
That risk shall not counted as for comparison as that is associated universally. Further, the risk associated with particular factors like bankruptcy of a company, or some legal case issue of a company are precisely described by beta coefficient.
Thus, beta provides better details about explaining the returns.
Answer:
True, but it applies to everyone in the organization.
Explanation:
Modern companies can only be successful if every single employee works as a team member, since competition keeps increasing and customers' expectations keep rising.
Every single role within an organization is important. Can supply chain professionals distribute a product that doesn't exist (wasn't manufactured on time)? Could they distribute a product that no one wants to buy (marketing and sales are extremely important also)? Could anyone work if the finance department couldn't do its job and there was no money in the company?
We tend to believe that what we do is extremely important and difficult to do, and other people have it easier because their are simpler than ours. But that is just nonsense. Once I heard a quarterback talking about who was the most important player in a football team, and his answer really surprised me, "Quarterbacks fill stadiums, but defenses earn championships". On a team no one is more important, the chain breaks on its weakest link.
Hello there!
There is quite a HUGE difference between these both. When being frauded or making a fraud, this would also be known as stealing money.
But when making a mistake in a statement, they can be things resolved faster than if a person were to steal money. When making this mistake, you could resolve this by explaining why this was a mistake and also what could you do to fix it as well.
Both of these kind of acts are seriously two major different things, they have nothing in common.
Answer:
By writing that check and investing in mutual funds, M1 will decrease, but M2 will remain the same.
Explanation:
M1 includes currency and coin, demand deposits, travelers' checks, check accounts, and negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) accounts.
M2 includes all M1 + savings deposits, money market securities, mutual funds, and other time deposits.
Answer:
D. Good intentions do not always lead to desirable outcomes.
Explanation:
Here in the question, it is evident that in order to protect the children from poisoning themselves, the government took a good step by passing a regulation to put child-resistance safety caps on the pill bottles.
But it is also evident that this regulation back fired and caused more casualties than before due to the non serious behavior of the general public.
Hence it can be concluded that the government put a good intention but it did not lead to the desired outcome for the government.
Hope I made myself clear buddy.
Good Luck.
