You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Standard Form: ax² + bx + c = y
Basically, you put all the numbers from greatest to least with exponents then variables.
We have the numbers:
9
-x²
2x^5
-7x
Put these numbers from least to greatest from the exponents.
2x^5 - x² - 7x + 9
The degree of the polynomial is the number with the greatest exponent. In this case, the highest exponent is 5.
The degree of the polynomial is 5.
Best of Luck!
The unit rate is 3 strike in 1 inning.
Answer:
I don't know 1
2. 3/4
3. y= 1000(0.75)^x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:15
Step-by-step explanation:
You have to divide the fractions so it 3/4÷1/10 then you can do keep change flip so the new equation is 3/4×10/1 or 3/4×10 then cross simply then get 3/2×5/1 to get 15/2 then use division to get 7 1/2