Answer:
B. Of organizational life according to which even democratic organizations will become bureaucracies ruled by a few individuals.
Explanation:
The "iron law of oligarchy" notes that all types of organization must gradually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, regardless of how democratic they may be at the outset, rendering true democracy actually and theoretically impossible, particularly in large groups and complex organisations, it is an Organizational theory in which even a democratic entity inevitably evolves into a bureaucracy dominated by a few individuals.
The "iron law of oligarchy " reflects that if a democratic organisation, then a non-democratic organisation, will never be fully democratic.
Desk will be far from each other you would need lots of hand sanitizer and their will be new rules hanged up on walls education will not be affected hard because you probably would not have time to talk about that but you will definitely have new rules
Answer:
awesome! happy pride month!
Explanation:
Supreme court has the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a federal law or action is constitutional.
What is the role of Supreme court ?
- For all issues and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States, the Court is the highest tribunal in the country. The Supreme Court serves as the final arbiter of law, upholding the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans. In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's protector and interpreter.
- According to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Supreme Court is "distinctly American in idea and function." Few other courts in the world have the same constitutional interpretation authority, and none have used it as extensively or for as long.
- The strong adherence of the American people to the Rule of Law and to constitutional government is a major contributor to the Supreme Court's unique position.
To know more about Supreme court visit:
brainly.com/question/2528721
#SPJ4
When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.
Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
