Answer:
Ionic equation:
Na⁺(aq) + OH⁻(aq) + H⁺(aq) + Cl⁻(aq) → H₂O(l) + Na⁺(aq) + Cl⁻ (aq)
Explanation:
Chemical equation:
NaOH(aq) + HCl(aq) → H₂O(l) + NaCl (aq)
Balanced chemical equation:
NaOH(aq) + HCl(aq) → H₂O(l) + NaCl (aq)
Ionic equation:
Na⁺(aq) + OH⁻(aq) + H⁺(aq) + Cl⁻(aq) → H₂O(l) + Na⁺(aq) + Cl⁻ (aq)
Net ionic equation:
OH⁻(aq) + H⁺(aq) → H₂O(l)
The Cl⁻(aq) and Na⁺ (aq) are spectator ions that's why these are not written in net ionic equation. The water can not be splitted into ions because it is present in liquid form.
Spectator ions:
These ions are same in both side of chemical reaction. These ions are cancel out. Their presence can not effect the equilibrium of reaction that's why these ions are omitted in net ionic equation.
Answer:
a. True
b. True
c. False
d. True
Explanation:
a). A a very low substrate concentration , 
. Thus according to the Machaelis-Menten equation becomes
![$V_0 = \frac{V_{max} \times [S]}{Km}$](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%24V_0%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BV_%7Bmax%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5BS%5D%7D%7BKm%7D%24)
Here since the 
varies directly to the substrate concentration [S], the initial velocity is lower than the maximal velocity. Thus option (a) is true.
b). The Michaelis -Menten kinetics equation states that :
![$V_0 = \frac{V_{max} \times [S]}{Km+[S]}$](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%24V_0%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BV_%7Bmax%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%5BS%5D%7D%7BKm%2B%5BS%5D%7D%24)
Here the initial velocity changes directly with the substrate concentration as is directly proportional to [S]. But 
is same for any particular concentration of the enzymes. Thus, option (b) is true.
c). As the substrate concentration increases, the initial velocity also increases. Thus option (c) is false.
d). Option (d) explains the procedures to estimate the initial velocity which is correct. Thus, option (d) is true.
No, they do not. It is not true.
There are many pieces of evidence provided as strong evidence: fro example the Comparative anatomy of many species. <span>This evidence is based on compares of the the skeletons of humans, cats, whales, and bats, illustrating how similar they are even though these animals live unique lifestyles in very different environments. Another piece of evidence is </span><span>biochemistry of all living things on Earth. This is so because is incredibly similar. This shows that all of Earth’s organisms share a common ancestry.</span>
