Answer:
p1=2(3+6)p1=18p2=2(30+60)p2=180p2/p1=180/18=10c. The perimeter will be 10 times the original. More
Answer:
x = 8
Step-by-step explanation:
When cutting the wire we will get two pieces
x and 12 - x
If we build a circle whith x , the lenght of the circle will be x, and if we look at the equation for a lenght of a cicle 2*π*r = x
then r = x/2π
and consequentely A₁ = area of a circle = πr² A₁ = π*x/2π
A₁ = x/2
With the other piece 12 - x we have to make an square so wehave to divide that piece in four equal length
side of the square = s
s = 1/4 ( 12 - x ) and the area is A₂ = [1/4 ( 12 - x)]²
A₂ = ( 12 - x )²/16
Then A₁ + A₂ = A(t) and this area as fuction of x
A (x) = x/2 + 1/16 ( 144 + x² -24x) A (x) =[ (8x + 144 + x² -24x)]/16
Taken derivatives in both sides
A´(x) = 8 + 2x - 24 = 0
2x -16 = 0 x = 8 and s = 12 - 8 s = 4
Sally:
First you would divided 1.5 with two-thirds
<u>1.5 pages</u>=2.249(9's are repeating<u>
</u>2/3
Mike: <u> </u>
<u>1/2 pages</u>=2.994 (9's are also repeating not 4)
1/6
Basically, Mike is typing the most pages per hour.
<em>I hope this help you understand :D</em>
Since the function and choices are already given, the simplest method would be to try out the given values of x and see if the value of y obtained and given int he choices would coincide. Using this trial and error method, it has been shown that the correct answer among the choices is choice C, with the solution shown below:
y = -0.296x^2 + 2.7x
Using (4.6, 6.2):
y = -0.296(4.6)^2 + 2.7(4.6)
y = 6.2
Answer:
No, because the 95% confidence interval contains the hypothesized value of zero.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have the information regarding two calcium supplements.
X₁: Calcium content of supplement 1
n₁= 12
X[bar]₁= 1000mg
S₁= 23 mg
X₂: Calcium content of supplement 2
n₂= 15
X[bar]₂= 1016mg
S₂= 24mg
It is known that X₁~N(μ₁; σ²₁), X₂~N(μ₂;δ²₂) and σ²₁=δ²₂=?
The claim is that both supplements have the same average calcium content:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ = 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
The confidence level and significance level are to be complementary, so if 1 - α: 0.95 then α:0.05
since these are two independent samples from normal populations and the population variances are equal, you have to use a pooled variance t-test to construct the interval:
[(X[bar]₁-X[bar]₂) ± 
* 
]
[(1000-1016)±2.060*23.57*
]
[-34.80;2.80] mg
The 95% CI contains the value under the null hypothesis: "zero", so the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Then using a 5% significance level you can conclude that there is no difference between the average calcium content of supplements 1 and 2.
I hope it helps!
