Answer:
Podemos distinguir si algo es bueno o malo moralment basandonos en nuestros actos y las consequencias de ellos. Algo sera bueno cuando este de acuerdo con dichas normas, y malo cuando este en desacuerdo.
The answer is most likely:
none
This question has choices including none of the above. The first choice seems to be inappropriate wherein it states that prepared core typical of prehistoric modern humans that inhabited this region, and the other two choices doesn't fit the question too. Thus, the answer is none of the above.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
an abolitionist is someone who is against slavery or capital punishment.
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
