Answer:
Dostoevsky style in film; “American Idol” winners.
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>Positive reinforcement</u>
Explanation:
Positive reinforcement: In psychology, the term "positive reinforcement" is determined as a phenomenon in which an individual is being provided with something when he or she performs a specific "desired action or task" in order to get associated with the given reward and perform the task or action in future. Thus, in the given scenario reward is considered as a "reinforcing stimulus".
<u>In the question above, the correct answer is positive reinforcement.</u>
The answer to this question is a conflict of interest. Code
of ethics is simply is a set of rules and regulations issued by an
organization, company, or business which is being followed by its members,
staff, and employees. In the code of ethics, it also states the company’s
mission and vision which the employees use as a guide to make the company run
smoothly and achieve its goal. Conflict of interest in a code of ethics means
that the person is being involved in a situation where his or her judgments are
being compromised. Conflict of interest
also involves when a person benefited on a situation that conflicts his role or
duty.
Answer:
FIRST: You had tell the person that you were going to start an action against them to be heard in "court". You had to bring witnesses with you so your witnesses could testify that the person was told why you were bringing an action, and that you had given this person a date, time, and location that they had to appear in court to defend themselves.
SECOND: You had to post a written notice near the courthouse that clearly stated the names of both parties, the charges, and the date, time, and location of your first trip to court on this action.
FIRST TIME IN COURT: The first trip gave both parties a chance to speak before a judge. If the judge felt there was enough cause, that judge would assign a trial date. That trial date had to be posted as well.
JURY SELECTION, TRIAL BY JURY: To be on a jury, you had to be a citizen. You had to be over 30 years of age. You had to swear that you would be fair to both sides. You did get paid. Juries were selected from volunteers. The number of jurors could be huge. Some trials had as many as 500 jurors who had volunteered to judge a case. Only the jury could bring in a decision that someone was guilty or innocent. The judge only kept order, but could not decide a trial outcome.
THE TRIAL: Both sides presented their case. Then the jurors voted. Majority ruled.
PUNISHMENT: Punishments varied. If found guilty, both sides, the person bringing the charge and the person being charged, suggested a punishment. The jury could not choose a third choice. They had to choice one suggestion or the other.
Explanation:
They would win the lawsuit because they are entitled to theyre own opinion and should never have been fired for it in the first place. so ive narrowed it down to the top 2 because i know for a fact the company wont win and they were fired without due process and number two is not in the constitution so it is the first one .
the employees will win because the constitution prevents them from being fired without due process.
