Answer:
A. There is more dissolved oxygen in colder waters than in warm water.
D. If ocean temperature rise, then the risk to the fish population increases.
Explanation:
Conclusion that can be drawn from the two facts stated above:
*Dissolved oxygen is essential nutrient for fish survival in their aquatic habitat.
*Dissolved oxygen would decrease as the temperature of aquatic habit rises, and vice versa.
*Fishes, therefore, would thrive best in colder waters than warmer waters.
The following are scenarios that can be explained by the facts given and conclusions arrived:
A. There is more dissolved oxygen in colder waters than in warm water (solubility of gases decreases with increase in temperature)
D. If ocean temperature rise, then the risk to the fish population increases (fishes will thrive best in colder waters where dissolved oxygen is readily available).
Answer:
Gases are easily compressed. We can see evidence of this in Table 1 in Thermal Expansion of Solids and Liquids, where you will note that gases have the largest coefficients of volume expansion. The large coefficients mean that gases expand and contract very rapidly with temperature changes. In addition, you will note that most gases expand at the same rate, or have the same β. This raises the question as to why gases should all act in nearly the same way, when liquids and solids have widely varying expansion rates.
The answer lies in the large separation of atoms and molecules in gases, compared to their sizes, as illustrated in Figure 2. Because atoms and molecules have large separations, forces between them can be ignored, except when they collide with each other during collisions. The motion of atoms and molecules (at temperatures well above the boiling temperature) is fast, such that the gas occupies all of the accessible volume and the expansion of gases is rapid. In contrast, in liquids and solids, atoms and molecules are closer together and are quite sensitive to the forces between them.
Answer:
How does non-human life in an urban ecosystem differ from that in an undeveloped forest ecosystem?
Explanation:
In forest eco system the people are uncivilized and not so much educated. And in urban eco system people are intelligent as well as educated this is the main reason. In an urban ecosystem, the only non-human life that live there are the ones that are able to survive under the conditions. However, in undeveloped forest ecosystems, there’s barely any pollution. Therefore, a bigger variety of non-human life is able to live here.
Mark brainliest if you can please :)
I think it would be solubility but I’m not sure
