a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
Answer: each book costs $13
Step-by-step explanation:
dividing 65 by 5 gets the answer
It does not crosses any axises. 3rd case is true. I passes through the point 1, e
Answer:
2.4x105
Step-by-step explanation:
D
Answer:
m<4=40
Step-by-step explanation:
Supplementary angles form 180 degrees
m<3 is vertical to the 50 degree angle which is equal.
so. m<3=50
m<5=90
90+50=140
180-140=40
m<4=40
