1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga nikolaevna [1]
4 years ago
8

In a fluorescent tube of diameter 4.8 cm , 2.7 × 1018 electrons (with a charge of −e) and 2.4 × 1018 positive ions (with a charg

e of +e) flow in opposite directions through a cross-sectional each second. What is the current in the tube? The fundamental charge is 1.602 × 10−19 C. Answer in units of A.
Physics
1 answer:
Lesechka [4]4 years ago
7 0

Answer: 0.817A

Explanation:

Assuming , that one coulomb per second of negative charge alone flow through a conductor and no positive charges flow. I.e Q=It

It means a current of one A flow in the opposite direction.

This is similar to one coulomb per second of positive charge flowing through and there is no negative charge,

In addition, the one coulomb per second of positive charge flows. This is flowing in the current direction of the previous one. Then, the total current is 2 A. Since 2 coulomb of positive charges flow through one due to real positive charge and another due to the negative charge flowing in opposite direction.The charges cannot cancel each other, because even before the current flow the conductor was neutral.

According to this, the current in the given problem is

[2.7 + 2.4] x 10 ^ 18 * 1.602 x 10^ [-19] C/s

= 0.817 A

You might be interested in
Do you guys know any videos that’ll help understand soh cah toa
maria [59]
The video called “SOH CAH TOA: how to solve a right triangle.”
This is explained very well. Make sure you write down the “equations” of SOH CAH and TOA. It helps a lot to be able to go back and plug in from the equation.
7 0
3 years ago
Assume the earth to be a nonrotating sphere with mass MEME and radius RERE. If an astronaut weights WW on the ground, what is hi
Solnce55 [7]

Answer:

The weight at a distance 2 RE from surface of earth is <em>W/9</em>

Explanation:

For the value of acceleration due to gravity (g), we have a formula, that is:

g = (G)(ME)/(RE)²    ----- equation (1)

where,

G = Gravitational Constant

ME = Mass of Earth

RE = Radius of Earth

g = Acceleration due to gravity on surface of earth = 9.8 ms²

When the person goes 2RE, distance above earth's surface. Then the total distance from center of earth becomes: 2RE + RE = 3RE.

Therefore, equation (1) becomes:

gh = (G)(ME)/(3RE)²

where,

gh = acceleration due to gravity at height

gh = (G)(ME)/(RE)²9

using equation (1), we get:

gh = g/9

Now, he weight is given by formula:

W = mg   ------- equation (2)

At height 2RE

Wh = (m)(gh)

where,

Wh = Weight at height = ?

m = mass of astronaut

Therefore, using vale of gh, we get:

Wh = mg/9

Using equation (2), we get:

<u>Wh = W/9</u>

6 0
3 years ago
A car is moving at 76 miles per hour. the kinetic energy of that car is 5 × 105 j. how much energy does the same car have when i
valentina_108 [34]
Its would be 144. cause if u think about it
3 0
3 years ago
A car has a mass of 1600 kg. It is stuck in the snow and is being pulled out by a cable that applies a force of 7560 N due north
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Acceleration of the car will be a=0.1375m/sec^2

Explanation:

We have given mass of the ball m = 1600 kg

Force in north direction F= 7560 N

Resistance force which opposes the movement of car F_R=7340N

So net force on the car F_{net}=F-F_R=7560-7340=220N

According to second law of motion we know that F=ma

So 220=1600\times a

a=0.1375m/sec^2

7 0
3 years ago
If the Earth and distant stars were stationary (motionless) in space, what would we observe about the wavelength from these star
torisob [31]
There's no such thing as "stationary in space".  But if the distance
between the Earth and some stars is not changing, then (A) w<span>avelengths
measured here would match the actual wavelengths emitted from these
stars. </span><span>

</span><span>If a star is moving toward us in space, then (A) Wavelengths measured
would be shorter than the actual wavelengths emitted from that star.

</span>In order to decide what's actually happening, and how that star is moving, 
the trick is:  How do we know the actual wavelengths the star emitted ?


 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is intelligent design science
    5·1 answer
  • n object moves with a constant speed of 30 m/s on a circular track of radius 150 m. What is the acceleration of the object
    14·1 answer
  • In a double-slit experiment, the slit separation is 2.0 mm, and two wavelengths, 750 nm and 900 nm, illuminate the slits. A scre
    6·1 answer
  • Energy is defined as ____. a. ​movement of electrons b. ​capacity to store sugar c. ​the movement of atoms and molecules d. ​the
    13·1 answer
  • explain why a wrecking ball can destroy a building, but a yo-yo cant. Use the term kinetic energy in your explanation.
    5·2 answers
  • What is the value of x if one side is 8 and the other side is 6
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement is true?
    10·1 answer
  • Find the work done after the chair moved 4.40m along the ramp
    14·1 answer
  • Define Kinetic Energy:
    10·2 answers
  • The force of attraction that a -40.0 μC point charge exerts on a +108 μC point charge has magnitude 4.00 N. How far apart are th
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!