<span>Can vary among individuals or groups within a single society, is what we holds as symbols that the meanings is attached. The people or humans have an unlimited capacity to create and manipulate symbols, they are also makes so many ideas to create symbols and it is continuous over time.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
By exercising its power to determine the constitutionality of federal and state government actions, the Supreme Court has developed a large body of judicial decisions, or “precedents,” interpreting the Constitution. How the Court uses precedent to decide controversial issues has prompted debate over whether the Court should follow rules identified in prior decisions or overrule them. The Court’s treatment of precedent implicates longstanding questions about how the Court can maintain stability in the law by adhering to precedent under the doctrine of stare decisis while correcting decisions that rest on faulty reasoning, unworkable standards, abandoned legal doctrines, or outdated factual assumptions.
Answer:
B. alarm reaction
Explanation:
General adaptation syndrome: It is proposed by Hans Selye.
The term general adaptation syndrome is also referred to as GAS and is defined as an individual's bodily short and long-term reactions to stress. There is three-stage in GAS, they are:
1. Alarm reaction stage.
2. Resistance stage.
3. Exhaustion stage.
Alarm reaction: The term alarm reaction is defined as the initial or first stage of an individual's body response to any stressful stimuli that can adapt physiological changes, for example, increased heart rate.
In the question above, the phase of the general adaptation syndrome which Cameron is most likely to experience is the alarm reaction.
Answer: A. In extreme cases when the potential damage is clear and irreparable
Explanation: Hazardous materials that cause harm to the environment are regulated by laws, each of which is targeted at particular problems.
A concerned citizen has the right, granted by both state and federal laws, to sue any individual or organization responsible for a form of pollution to halt the activity causing the pollution.
In extreme cases and where there is evidence that the pollution will cause clear and irreparable damage, a judge may halt the action causing the pollution before a violation of the law has been proven in court.
