(2.34/ 7.89) times 100 = ˜29.65%
The answer to the first question of the attached document is option 1. We obtain the answer subtracting the term n from the series with the term n-1.For example:
-3 - (- 5) = 2
-1 - (- 3) = 2
1 - (- 1) = 2
So you can see that the common difference is the 2.
The answer to the second question is option 3:
y = | x + 7 |
We can confirm it by substituting values in the equation.
For example:
if we do y = 0 then x = -7
if we do x = 0 then y = 7.
As corresponds in the graph shown.
Remember also that as a general rule yes to the equationy = | x | whose vertex is in the point (0,0) we add a positive real number "a" of form y = | x + a | then the graph of y = | x | will move "to" units in the negative direction of x.
The answer to the third question is option 4.
The quotient of x and "and" is constant.
k = y / x
Rewriting:
y = kx
You can see that it corresponds to the equation of a line that passes through the origin, this means that and is proportional to x and both vary directly
Based on the elements and charges in Copper (II) Oxalate, CuC₂O₄(s), the solubility in pure water is 1.7 x 10⁻⁴ M.
<h3>What is the solubility of Copper (II) Oxalate in pure water?</h3>
The solubility equilibrium (Ksp) is 2.9 x 10⁻⁸ so the solubility can be found as:
Ksp = [Cu²⁺] [C₂O₄²⁻]
Solving gives:
2.9 x 10⁻⁸ = S x S
S² = 2.9 x 10⁻⁸
S = 1.7 x 10⁻⁴ M
Find out more on solubility at brainly.com/question/23659342.
#SPJ1
Y = sin(x^2)
Use the chain rule.
We want dy/dx.
dy/dx = cos(x^2)*2x
dy/dx = 2xcos(x^2)
Did you follow?
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't know if the first set of numbers is all in one set, but I'll do my best to give you an answer.
Really all you need to do is use PEMDAS for the first question.
(Parentheses, exponents, multiply, divide, add, subtract. In that order)
Then to simplify that fraction next to it, notice that 0.018 is 3x 0.06.
that's a 3:1 ratio, so it ends up simplifying to this:
Lastly, to solve the division of that fraction. If you divide by a fraction, you multiply whatever it's dividing by its inverse.
So...
