Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the first ine make sense to me
if not right sorry
We don’t see nothing or no image
Answer:
Firstly, notice the relationship the two triangles have. They have conjoining ends that form vertical angles (looks like a middle x). Vertical angles are equivalent in measure of degrees.
Secondly, notice that the triangle on the right side is a right triangle. One of its angle's measurements are also given; 40 degrees. If you know that the sum of a triangle's angles equal 180 degrees, then simply subtract the known angles measurements from 180.
180-(90+40)= 180-130=50.
Therefore, the vertical angles measurement is equivalent to 50 degrees.
Apply the principle of the sum of all angles in a triangle equivalent to 180 degrees to the left triangle, and you will be able to find the measurement of the "?" angle.
180-(50+25)= 180-75=105
SO HERE IS YOUR ANSWER= 105 degrees is the value of the angle marked with a "?"
I hope you are having a great day too;)!
The speed is the distance covered by an object at a particular time. It will take Max 10.6 hours to catch up with Rachel.
<h3>What is speed?</h3>
The speed is the distance covered by an object at a particular time. Therefore, it is the ratio of distance and time.
Speed = Distance / Time
Given that Max leaves Las Vegas one hour after Rachel leaves. Also, the speed at which Rachel is travelling is 53 miles per hour. Therefore, the distance covered by Rachel in one hour is,
Distance covered by Rachel = 1 hour × 53 miles per hour = 53 miles
Now, the distance between Max and Rachel is 53 miles. Therefore, the time it will take Max to reach Rachel can be found as,
Time needed to catch up with Rachel = Distance / relative speed
Time = 53 miles / (58 mph - 53 mph)
= 53 miles / 5 mph
= 10.6 hours
Hence, it will take Max 10.6 hours to catch up with Rachel.
Learn more about Speed here:
brainly.com/question/15100898
#SPJ1
Answer:
SSS
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, the picture says asks why the triangles are congruent but your question asks why they aren't congruent, so I will just assume that you made a typo, and you really meant: "Which rule explains why these triangles are congruent?"
Well, the triangles have two congruent sides, and they have a common shared side that are both congruent (due to reflexive property), so the triangle theorem SSS (Side-Side-Side) proves that the triangles are both congruent.
