Answer:
Option a is right
a) Since the subjects were not randomly selected for the study, we cannot conclude that a reduction in cavities can be attributed to the fluoride treatment.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in an experiment to measure the effect of fluoride "varnish" on the incidence of tooth cavities, 34 10-year-old-girls whose parents volunteered them for the study were raOne group was given fluoride varnish annually for 4 years along with a standard dental hygiene regimen;
the other group only followed the standard dental hygiene regimen.
The mean number of cavities in the two groups was compared at the end of the treatments. ndomly assigned to two groups.
Because they have selected 34 volunteers, the sample is not selected at random. This is biased one. Also sample size is very small compared to 10 year old girls in the world.
a) Since the subjects were not randomly selected for the study, we cannot conclude that a reduction in cavities can be attributed to the fluoride treatment.
is the right answer
Mr. Rowley : 16/14 reduces to 8/7
Ms. Rivera : 64/60 reduces to 16/15
No, these ratios are not equivalent. Because ratios can be written as fractions....and 8/7 is not equivalent to 16/15
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
54 dived by 1.5 is 36.
36 dived by 12 is 3.
You need 3 boxes.
You find the volume dummy
D because there’s a pattern. Pattern for x is that it’s adding by one. Pattern for y is that it’s adding by 15
