All categories

3 years ago

Why doesn’t zero have an opposite

1 answer:

3 0

Zero does not have a opposite, because it is not a positive number nor a negative number. It has no reciprocal either

hope this helps

You might be interested in

5e = 18.1 ---I gotta know what number the e is---

Inessa [10]

Answer:

b I guess

Step-by-step explanation:

I just wanna get point

6 0

3 years ago

PLSSS HELP IF YOU TURLY KNOW THISS

lesantik [10]

Answer:

x=4 hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Which statements are true about the interquartile range? Select all that apply.

kap26 [50]

Is there a picture? there's not enough info

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can you explain please I don’t understand?

Angelina_Jolie [31]

don't be alarmed the two lines just mean absolute value, the problem is asking what is m. the problem is asking what number multipyed by 2, subtracted by 1 will give you 3?

2x2=4 right?

so 4-1=3 there!

m=4

so the problem is 2(4)-1=3

i hope i explained well enough!

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An investment services company experienced dramatic growth in the last two decades. The following models for the company's reven

zlopas [31]

Answer: a) 138.32 and b) 35 years approx.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

$R(t)=21.4e^{0.13t}\\\\C(t)=18.6e^{0.13t}$

So, Profit is given by

$Profit=R(t)-C(t)\\\\Profit=21.4e^{0.13t}-18.6e^{0.13t}\\\\Profit=e^{0.13t}(21.4-18.6)\\\\Profit=2.8e^{0.13t}$

Difference in years of 1990 and 2020=30

So, Profit becomes :

$P(30)=2.8e^{0.13\times 30}\\\\P(30)=2.8\times 49.40\\\\P(30)=138.32$

(b) How long before the profit found in part (a) is predicted to double? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) years after 1990.

So, profit doubles , we get :

$138.32\times 2=2.8e^{0.13t}\\\\276.65=2.8e^{0.13t}\\\\\dfrac{276.65}{2.8}=e^{0.13t}\\\\98.80=e^[0.13t}\\\\\ln 98.80=0.13t\\\\4.593=0.13t\\\\\dfrac{4..593}{0.13}=t\\\\35.33=t$

Hence, a) 138.32 and b) 35 years approx.

6 0

3 years ago