Answer:
Surpreme Court of the United States
Explanation:
If it is suspected that the District Attourny made a mistake, the next highest step in the Surpreme Court of the United States.
Clear and present danger test, says speech may be restricted if evidence exists that such expression would endanger the public.
<h3>What is a clear and present danger test?</h3>
The clear and present danger test stressed that
printed or spoken word may not be the subject of previous restraint.
Unless there is a danger created by that expression, this test was originated in Schenck v. the United States.
Learn more about clear and present danger test at;
brainly.com/question/24452126
Answer:
<h2> 《《☆HEY BUDDY☆》》</h2>
<h2>1.Conservative wing 1.1Christian rights </h2><h2>1.2.neoconservatives </h2><h2>1.3.Paleoconservatives </h2><h2>1.4Tea party movement </h2><h2>1.5Traditionalists</h2><h2>moderate wing</h2>
B. Yes, because the philanthropist is the owner of the residence.