The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
Answer:
Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918
Explanation:
Answer:
This question lacks options, options are: a. Active chronic gastritis b. Acute gastritis c. Autoimmune gastritis d. Chronic gastritis e. Peptic ulcer disease
The correct answer is b.
Explanation:
Acute gastritis is characterized by an inflammatory infiltrate that is predominantly neutrophilic and is usually transient in nature, it may be accompanied by mucosal hemorrhage, erosions and if the lesions are very severe, associated with bleeding. Gastric mucosa lesions are characterized by present edema and congestion confined to the epithelium. The main form is acute erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis, which is characterized by the presence of erosions in the stomach wall that affect only the mucosa.
Answer:
Johnson's vision of Reconstruction had proved remarkably lenient. Very few Confederate leaders were prosecuted. By 1866, 7,000 Presidential pardons had been granted. Brutal beatings of African-Americans were frequent.
Answer:
Highways
Explanation:
You are giving us 17 points not 30
plzzz brainliest
