Refractive index is the ration of sin i to sin r where i is the incident angle and r is the refraction angle.
Therefore, refractive index = sin 79.5 / sin 39.6
= 1.542
The refractive index may be given by the ratio of refractive index of medium 2 to refractive index of medium 1.
Therefore, 1.542 = n/1.0003
n = 1.5425
≈ 1.54
Medium 2 is sodium chloride, refractive index of 1.54
Answer:
a = F-ff/m
Explanation:
According to Newton's second law of motion which states that "the rate of change in momentum of a body is directly proportional to the applied force F and acts in the direction of the force.
Mathematically;
F = ma
Since two forces acts on the cart i.e the moving force F and the frictional force Ff , we will take the sum of the forces.
∑F = ma where
m is the mass of the cart
a is its acceleration
∑F = F+(-ff )(since frictional force is an opposing force)
F - ff = ma
Dividing both sides by mass m
a = F-ff/m
Answer:
6) False
7) True
8) False
9) False
10) False
11) True
12) True
13) True
14) True
Explanation:
The spacing between two energy levels in an atom shows the energy difference between them. Clearly, B has a greater value of ∆E compared to A. This implies that the wavelength emitted by B is greater than A while B will emit fewer, more energetic photons.
When atoms jump from lower to higher energy levels, photons are absorbed. The kinetic energy of the incident photon determines the frequency, wavelength and colour of light emitted by the atom.
The energy level to which an atom is excited is determined by the kinetic energy of the incident electron. As the voltage increases, the kinetic energy of the electron increases, the further the atom is from the source of free electrons, the greater the required kinetic energy of free electron. When electrons are excited to higher energy levels, they must return to ground state.
<span>Psychological researchers must debrief human test subjects </span><span>at the end of every experiment.
The current code of ethics in p</span>sychological research states that researchers absolutely must debrief human test subjects at the end of every study regardless or whether or not harm or deception was involved.
Debriefing a subject after a study is an essential opportunity for the researcher to explain the purpose and aim of the study to the subject, make sure the subject is not harmed or mentally disturbed, clarify why deception was used (if deception was involved) and overall, to clarify any questions or doubts the subject might have.
