<span>A typical married couple would probably be a. Gilbert would be for splitting the household chores on the basis of time spent on each task. However, it is a bit unusual to actually calculate the time it takes for each task. B. and c. doesn't make sense. D. is also valid, however.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D)
Explanation:
Outside directors hold no affiliation with the company except that of being a non-executive director.
They are usually entitled to compensation in the form of annual retainer fees which may be in cash, benefits and/or stock options.
Outside directors are usually beneficial to the board because they are deemed to be more objective than any other member as they have no other stake in the business. Outside directors, on the balance of probability, will give an unbiased opinion, recommendations, and or judgements.
Cheers!
-$264,000
Explanation:
Below is a summary of the net cash flows from investing operations for the year.
flow of money from investments
Equipment purchase: $260,000
$87,000 was earned from the sale of equipment.
Land purchase: $91,000
-$264,000 in net cash flow was utilised for investing activities.
Sales are a cash inflow, so they would be added, whereas the purchase is a cash outflow, so it would be reflected as a minus sign.
To learn more about cash flows from the given link.
brainly.com/question/735261
#SPJ4
Answer:
Instructions are listed below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Year A B
0 -$6000
1 -$500
2 -$1000
3 -$1500
4 -$2000
5 -$2500
-$6000 -$7500
We don´t have enough information to determine which project is the best. We need the cash flow of Project B.
But, I can provide with the Net Present Value (NPV) formula and calculate the NPV of project A. The project with the higher NPV is more profitable.
To calculate the Net present value, we need to discount the cash flows.
NPV= -Io + ∑[Cf/(1+i)^n]
Cf= cash flow
Project A:
NPV= -6,000 + 500/1.09 + 1,000/1.09^2 + 1,500/1.09^3 + 2,000/1.09^4 + 2,500/1.09^5
NPV= -$499.65
<span>Yes, Sam can sue the company because the company violated the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act. This act says companies must offer benefits to old workers who face discrimination. The benefits must be equal to the company's current workers and this company failed to follow this act.</span>