Tomochichi was the chief of the Yamacraw natives, a small band of Lower Creek Indians.
Answer:
normative ethics
Explanation:
Value theory is the study of how much a person values something
Moral psychology studies how morality is developed in a person.
Normative ethics studies the questions that emerge when a person is considering how to act in a moral sense.
The statement "do the ends justify the means?" is questioning the actions of a person in a moral sense.
So, it falls under normative ethics.
Answer:
Tongue clicking is A. conditioned stimulus.
Explanation:
When it comes to classical conditioning, we can define a conditioned stimulus as a neutral stimulus that has become associated with an unconditioned stimulus and, eventually, begins to trigger a conditioned response. Tongue clicking was neutral; it did not cause any reaction in Francis. However, tongue clicking became associated with tickling. Tickling does cause Francis to squirm and giggle. Later, even if tickling is not happening, just the tongue clicking is enough to trigger the conditioned response of squirming and giggling. Therefore, tongue clicking is the conditioned stimulus.
The words that best fit the given statement would be "after" and "at the same time as." The famous James-Lange theory in psychology was theorised by William James and Carl Lange in which the theory hypothesises that emotion could be caused by our body's physiological reactions from an event happening.
Of course, the range of arguments supporting compulsory voting is matched by a plethora of reasons why the U.S. should keep voting voluntary.
One of the major arguments given by those against compulsory voting is that it leads to a greater number of uninformed voters, noting that those who choose not vote are generally less educated on political issues than those who choose to vote. Critics argue that the resulting surplus of politically ignorant voters has three main negative consequences:
Misleading uninformed voters. It is often asserted that uninformed voters are more susceptible to the influence of money and spending on television ads. A short advertisement is likely to have a greater influence on an uninformed voter than one who already has strong views. This encourages the use of sensational and misleading advertising and may have a negative effect on campaigning techniques. While politicians no longer need to try to convince citizens to go out and vote, they still need to find ways to maximize their vote among less informed voters. Australian political scientist, Haydon Manning notes that compulsory voting often “require[s] banal sloganeering and crass misleading negative advertising.”
Ignoring the wishes of most voters. Since uninformed voters are more easily persuaded, some politicians may choose to focus on marginal voters and ignore their main base of support. Even if compulsory voting leads to less polarization, it may not result in better policy outcomes because complicated and nuanced legislation may be perceived negatively by swing voters.
Dampening the voice of the majority. An additional concern under a compulsory system is that people who are uninformed (or simply do not care about the outcome of an election) may end up voting randomly. The impact of ‘random’ votes ends up being particularly detrimental because it fails to increase civic engagement and may skew election results.
Compulsory voting presents some ethical challenges. Many people argue that it infringes upon individual liberty by denying people the ability to choose not to vote. While it is true that ballots may include a “none of the above” option (though, in practice, typically do not), the act of voting itself may be seen as “endorsing” the current politicians and political system, an endorsement that some citizens may not want to make.
While it seems pretty unlikely right now that compulsory voting will be adopted in the United States, at least on a federal level, it is a policy to keep in mind as America continues striving towards a better democracy.
Explanation:
