Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
Explanation:
First of all i will tell the person to come to me after work so that i will not embarrass him in front of our co-workers.then after work when he comes to me i will talk to him about how its unfair to make such a comment for someone religious belief cause just because the persons belief is different from yours that doesn't you should do something like that. he entitled to his own and your entitled to yours .so as conclusion after that i will tell him to not do it again. and apologize to whoever he made a rude comment about his religious beliefs .
hope this helps.
Because the both need opinions
Answer: I think the unknown substance is water.
Explanation: mark me the brainly-est
