Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Answer:
People would be happier and there would be less death by killing yourself ( you know what I mean) Video Games would not be as toxic. There is proof of this there was one time the whole inter was taken down for a day and people said they were happy. If it was state-regulated people would not say things that they would not say in person because there weak and hid being a phone, etc. Also all people on tw itter the twertards need to burn.
Explanation:
Answer:
Another possible explanations for Jorge's finding is that <u>the wind vane on the rooftop of the opposite building might be faulty.</u>
This is because, a faulty wind vane would not be able to give a correct reading (direction of the wind ) hence the reason why the wind vane is rotating in different directions.
Explanation:
