Answer:
its c
Explanation:
follow me at sssniper wolf ;D
The Federal Reserve does not pay interest on reserves held on deposit. The European System of Central Banks does pay interest on reserves held on deposit.
<h3>Federal Reserve Board</h3>
- In the past, reserve banks were unable to offer interest on deposits. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 brought about a shift in that.
- The Federal Reserve Board had to increase the size of its balance sheet by purchasing Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities in order to increase the amount of liquidity available to the banking sector.
<h3> European System of Central Banks</h3>
- The major objective is to preserve price stability or the euro's worth. Price stability is the most significant contribution monetary policy can make in this area because it is crucial for economic growth and job creation, two goals of the European Union.
- The ECB has four decision-making bodies with the authority to carry out the institution's goals.
To learn more about Federal reserve Board refer to:
brainly.com/question/13084954
#SPJ4
Answer:
Journal Entries
Dr. Investment in Lopez Railways Inc. $600,000
Cr. Cash $600,000
Dr. Investment in Lopez Railways Inc $59,600
Cr. Income of Investment in Lopez Railways Inc $59,600
Dr. Cash $10,800
Cr. Investment in Lopez Railways Inc $10,800
Explanation:
As Windsor Locomotive Corporation has purchased 40% interest in Lopez Railway Inc.Lopez Inc. is classified as the associate company of Windsor Corp.
Share in net Income = $149,000 x 40% = $59,600
Share In Dividend = $27,000 x 40% = $10,800
Answer:
c. This contract is void.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that one day Anna received a phone call from the health insurance salesman and she purchase a $400 medigap insurance policy so the contract should be void in the eyes of law as it is not valid in terms of law plus nothing is specified for whom she purchased the policy for $400
Therefore the correct option is c.
Answer:
Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.
Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:
+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;
+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.
+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.
Explanation: