The given statement is False.
People who keep domestic animals are strictly liable for any harm inflicted by the animals.
Explanation:
People keep many type of animals as pets in their homes. Some of the common animals which are being kept as pets are:
So if animals kept by people in their homes harm someone, or something, then the owner of the animal is not liable for it. This is because the animal's behavior is not is control of the people. People can only train them, but to always obey the owner is not in the hands of the owner. The nature of animals may not always remain the same, they can cause harm to things or people, but because they are animals, so the owner is not liable.
For example, a man has a dog as pet and his dog went in the neighbor's garden and dig the soil. In this case the owner is not liable for the damage the dog caused. No doubt the owner could help the neighbor in settling the things together but he is not liable for the damage,
Learn more about animals at:
brainly.com/question/11013494
#LearnWithBrainly
In the second time ever, the Court used<span> its power of </span>judicial review<span> to rule an act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) unconstitutional. ... Northerners charged that after Chief Justice Taney had shown that </span>Scott<span>, as a Negro, had no right to bring a case into a federal court, he should have ended his decision.</span>
Answer:
Scandinavian Peninsula
Explanation:
I just searched this up teehehe
The fuction of a heart is to pump the blood.
The answer is tax payers in the city or country.
May i have brainliest
