1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisabon 2012 [21]
3 years ago
15

(b) we often read that iq scores for large populations are centered at 100. what percent of these 78 students have scores above

100? (round your answer to one decimal place.)
Mathematics
1 answer:
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
5 0
Given that the<span> iq scores for large populations are centered at 100.

To get what percent of these 78 students have scores above 100 we conduct a normal distribution probability of the data.

P(x > 100) = P(z > (100 - 100)/sd) = P(z > 0) = 1 - P(z < 0) = 1 - 0.5 = 0.5 = 50%
</span>
You might be interested in
Find a formula for the general term an of the sequence, assuming that the pattern of the first few terms continues. (assume that
Brilliant_brown [7]
Im sorry but what kind of formula
8 0
3 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%284%20%2B%206i%29%20%7B%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20" id="TexFormula1" title="(4 + 6i) {}^{2} " alt="(4 +
34kurt

Answer:

36i^{2}+48i+16

Step-by-step explanation:

(4+6i)^{2} is essentially (4+6i)(4+6i) (you are squaring (4+6i), so multiplying it by itself), so to simplify, you would need to distribute.

A good way to go about this is using the F.O.I.L. method, multiplying the First numbers in the parentheses, then the Outers, then Inners, and finally, Lasts.

(4+6i)(4+6i) >> (4+6i)(4+6i) >> (4+6i)(4+6i) >> (4+6i)(4+6i)

((4*4)+(4*6i)+(6i*4)(6i*6i))

After doing so, you would end up with 16+24i+24i+36i^{2}, and after combining like terms, 16+48i+36i^{2}.

To write the expression in standard form, though, just order the terms from highest to lowest power!

5 0
2 years ago
Suppose that we were going to conduct a study to determine if there is an decrease in risk of getting lung cancer based on wheth
nalin [4]

Answer: Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

In group(1), the risk is= 5/2000 x 100

                          = 0.25

In group(2), the risk is= 5/1000 x 100

                         = 0.5

The sample relative risk is= 0.25/0.5

                                          = 0.5

So, option C is correct.

7 0
3 years ago
Comparing the two ratios 2/4 and 1/2<br> 2/4 is larger
kumpel [21]

Answer:

<em><u>3.5 : 7 > 1.2 : 2.5.</u></em>

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Compare the ratios 4 : 5 and 2 : 3.

Solution:

Express the given ratios as fraction

4 : 5 = 4/5 and 2 : 3 =2/3

Now find the L.C.M (least common multiple) of 5 and 3

The L.C.M (least common multiple) of 5 and 3 is 15.

Making the denominator of each fraction equal to 15, we have

4/5 = (4 ×3)/(5 ×3) = 12/15 and 2/3 = (2 ×5)/(3 ×5) = 10/15

Clearly, 12 > 10

Now, 12/15 > 10/15

Therefore, 4 : 5 > 2 : 3.

2. Compare the ratios 5 : 6 and 7 : 9.

Solution:

Express the given ratios as fraction

5 : 6 = 5/6 and 7 : 9 =7/9

Now find the L.C.M (least common multiple) of 6 and 9

The L.C.M (least common multiple) of 6 and 9 is 18.

Making the denominator of each fraction equal to 18, we have

5/6 = (5 ×3)/(6 ×3) = 15/18 and 7/9 = (7 ×2)/(9 ×2) = 14/18

Clearly, 15 > 14

Now, 15/18 > 14/18

Therefore, 5 : 6 > 7 : 9.

3. Compare the ratios 1.2 : 2.5 and 3.5 : 7.

Solution:

1.2 : 2.5 = 1.2/2.5 and 3.5 : 7 =3.5/7

1.2/2.5 = (1.2 ×10)/(2.5 ×10 ) = 12/25 and 3.5/7 = (3.5 ×10)/(7 ×10) = 35/70 = 1/2

[We removed the decimal point from the ratios now, we will compare the ratio]

Now find the L.C.M (least common multiple) of 25 and 2

The L.C.M (least common multiple) of 25 and 2 is 50.

Making the denominator of each fraction equal to 50, we have

= 12/25 = (12 ×2)/(25 ×2) = 24/50 and 1/2 = (1 ×25)/(2 ×25) = 25/50

Now, 25/50 > 24/50

Therefore, 3.5 : 7 > 1.2 : 2.5.

4 0
2 years ago
The Federal Bureau of Investigation reports state-level and national data on crimes.
SOVA2 [1]

Answer:

a)what was concluded is spurious

b) what was concluded could betrue

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.

b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 21 points... select more than one theres at least 3 i assume from the last one i did (but got wrong) thanks!!
    7·1 answer
  • ASAP BRAINLIEST!!!!! 2. Dave leaves his office in Padelford Hall on his way to teach in Gould Hall. Below are several different
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this please, I would really appreciate it, thank you!<br> (Geometry)
    13·1 answer
  • If 400g; 1kg<br>find the ratio in <br>Simplest form.<br>​
    5·1 answer
  • What does the line 5x+2y=8 look like?
    13·1 answer
  • A rectangle has a length 3x-1 and a width 2x. What is the perimeterof the rectangle
    11·2 answers
  • Help. I need help with these questions ( see image).<br> Please show workings.
    7·1 answer
  • Can you explain how to get that answer do I multiple divide add or subtract please help!!
    8·1 answer
  • Guyysss how do i do this problem im already failing this grade period
    11·1 answer
  • f is an even function. a = A 2-column table with 4 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 2, 0, 2, 3. Column 2 is lab
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!