I believe the prisoners and guards would have felt awkward on seeing each other in same civilian clothes.
It would be hard for them to handle while walking through the hallway.
<u>Explanation:</u>
At the conclusion of the study, I believe the students would have probably felt awkward on interacting with one another in classes and in public. Definitely the guards may feel ashamed of how they treated the prisoners. On the other hand the prisoners would feel cowed in the presence of those who treated them so poorly. Dr. Zimbardo says that the effect of study won’t last long on the lives of the participants.
Walking through the hallway again will make prisoners to handle it hard as they lived in prison there for some time. Especially when they were in psychology classes, because it was the room where they were isolated from the outside world and verbally abused. I'm sure it will be difficult for the participants to adjust back into their normal behaviors and routines.
The term that social psychologists use for the process of making people in and out group where they are made being responsible for the problems of people in the in group is scapegoat. It is a person that is being blamed for the mistakes that is done by others.
Answer:
natives had their own religions, beliefs and ways
The research error described above is an example of selection bias.
Selection bias takes place when, from a population of interest, a group of individuals is selected in order to construct a sample but without a proper randomization. The result is a sample which is not representative of the underlying population.
According to the example, the target population of the research comprises all students but the sample only includes boys. Hence, selection has not been random because it followed a gender criteria, and the results obtained using it cannot be applicable to the whole population because they are affected by a selection bias.
