Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
32
Step-by-step explanation:
16/20 reduces down to 2/5
set 2/5=x/80
cross multiply 160=5x
divide 32=x
check 2/5=32/80
32/80; 16/40; 8/20; 4/10; 2/5
yay 32 is the answer good luck :)
Answer:
is there any measurements included?
Step-by-step explanation:
The smaller the value of the least increment, the more precise a number is.
Length measured to the nearest 1/8 inch will be more precisely specified than length measured to the nearest 1/4 inch.
_____
In general, precision has little to do with accuracy—how close the measured value is to the actual value. A measurement can be very precise, but just plain wrong. (Many electronic instruments have resolution (precision) that exceeds their accuracy. That is, one or two (or more) of the least-significant displayed digits may be in error.)
