<span>The correct answer is a personality test. Technical and skill tests usually can be prepared since they involve skills necessary for the job that you're applying for, while the human resources tests usually have the same questions over and over again that can easily be found anywhere. Things like where do you see yourself in five years and similar questions. Personality quizzes however are difficult to prepare for and even more difficult to manipulate in your favor.</span>
Ching Chong
Uuhgft rhvtvtt tvvyvbvy
Answer:
I. Identify what is the problem
II. Acquire the data
III. Develop the model
IV. Implement the Model.
V. Do the results look right.
Explanation:
The problem-solving process can be defined as the systematic approach used to identify and determine the solution to a particular problem.
The steps involved in the problem-solving process are;
1. Identify and define the problem: this is the first step to be taken in solving a problem. This is to ensure that, the focus is on the main issue or situation and all efforts is channeled in the right direction rather than the symptoms.
2. Gathering of information: this helps to consider the options available in solving a problem effectively.
3. Consider your options: this helps to compare the available and viable solutions to the problem.
4. Weigh disadvantages and evaluate a solution: you weigh the disadvantages of each solution, before choosing the one with the least disadvantages.
Hence, the fundamental steps of the problem solving process in the correct order are;
I. Identify what is the problem
II. Acquire the data
III. Develop the model
IV. Implement the Model.
V. Do the results look right.
Answer:
A conglomerate is a business combination merging more than three businesses that make unrelated products.
Explanation:
A conglomerate is a group of companies with different activities. This business concept spread to Europe from the United States after World War II. The benefits were considered to increase the company's long-term profitability by spreading risk to various business areas.
However, conglomeration often led to an increase in administrative costs. Furthermore, the conglomerate's management rarely had the competence to handle a number of companies in different industries. The conglomerates that were listed on the stock exchange were regularly valued lower than the total market value of the subsidiaries, indicating that the stock market did not believe in the very idea of creating such corporate groups. The risk diversification that the conglomerate was aiming for could equally well be achieved by the individual investor in his own equity portfolio. Therefore, since the 1970s, many conglomerates have split up, and most companies have instead focused on creating competitive advantages through their core business.
Answer: The correct answer is True.
Explanation: This is a case of employer liability - employers are liable to their employees' act, whether it was due to the employer's intention or not, or whether the employer means to cause harm or not, provided the employees still act within the scope of their employment. The same applies if the employees had carried out good deeds within the scope of their employment, the employers share the good news - just the same way an employer profits from employee's labor, the employer is legally liable when the employee commits harm.
Employers are <em>vicariously liable</em> under doctrine of "respondeat superior" for the negligence or omissions caused by their employees during the course of their employment with the company. The doctrine of "respondeat superior" according to Law dictionary means a doctrine in tort law that makes a master liable for the wrong of a servant. There was a particular scenario I witnessed: a colleague of mine while working late at work had a visitor at the Reception and opted to see him. Unfortunately for her, an accident happended - a car broke into the office and she sustained a lot of injuries. The employer paid for all her reimbursable expenses during her treatment, paid her mum a certain amount for taking care of her, including buying her a new phone because the old one got damaged during the accident although insurance took care of some of the health bills. Because the employer knew it was binding in the court of law, she could not be forced to resume. She eventually resumed after 6 months!
