They do not need to be concerned because of the fact they <span>are not elected, they are appointed for life. </span>
Probable cause. An officer has reason to believe that a crime may be comitted. (physical evidence, observations, statements, video/audio.)
Searches. Officers are only allowed to do a pat down (terry search, frisk) as a protective measure. They can do a full search if a suspect is taken into custody.
4th amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizures.
When a suspect is being questioned (for incriminating information) they must be read their Miranda rights before proceeding. Basic questions are allowed. ("How are you doing?").
Abuse of police authority could be requesting to see an ID when there is no probable cause.
Egyptian priest-physician used powerful magic for which rituals, spells, incantations, talismans and amulets were used. Also used <span>carbohydrates from cereals, vitamins from fruit and vegetables, and proteins mostly from fish. Milk and milk products were just occasionally consumed, as were legumes, seeds and oil.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is "The fundamental attribution error".
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is the human tendency to emphasize personal characteristics instead of analyzing the contextual or situational explanation for other people's behavior.
<u>For example, when someone fails a test, the other students may think that their classmate failed because he is lazy or he didn't study enough and not because the questions of the test were wrongly formulated</u>.
In this particular case, the first attribution that one does to the jam is that the couple did it because they are bad communicators, only because they were arguing moments before, <u>rather than attributing the failure to get the frame to through the doorway to the possibility that it might be too big for the doorway.</u>
In conclusion, this is an example of the fundamental attribution error.
