Answer:
Option D is correct.
Third-degree price discrimination
Explanation:
tennis coach charges $15 per hour for tennis lesson for children and $30 per hour for tennis lessons for adults. This can be viewed as a practice of <u>Third-degree price discrimination.</u>
Third Degree Price Discrimination involves charging a different price to different groups of consumers for the same good. These groups of consumers can be identified by particular characteristics such as age, sex, location, time of use.
Answer:
Mergers or Information Management
Explanation:
Mergers-In order to respond to certain challenges, businesses may choose to merge with another business. The new business will have a larger market share than either of the original businesses did.
Information management -All changes lead to new information that needs to be distributed to all the relevant parties.
Information must be managed efficiently and a system must be in place so that the relevant staff can easily access it.
Information must be protected and kept secure to protect the company's intellectual property.
The other pervasive institutional consideration which may influence pay inequality include: technological advancement, globalization, wage-setting institutional changes. In a persuasive speech, the discourse will focus on the reasons for supporting your specific purpose statement. Read below about persuasive institutional consideration strategies.
<h3>What are persuasive strategies?</h3>
The persuasive strategies are logos, ethos and pathos. The peak effective persuasive communication usually has a mix of all three strategies. Logos uses logic or reason to reach a conclusion, while ethos depends upon the credibility of the author or speaker.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about persuasive strategies: brainly.com/question/24450505
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is b. a limitation-of-liability clause.
Explanation:
It is understood by pact of exemption of responsibility, the stipulation negotiated by the subjects of the obligation, directed to suppress the responsibility of the debtor in case of breach of the same.
The doctrine specialized in mountain law states that: "If a company organizes an activity and forces the participants to sign a document in which they assume full responsibility for what happens to them, it is of little use, the organizer is still responsible" . Although this statement must be expanded and nuanced, it can serve as a guide for what we will study next.
Answer:
The answer is: C) If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause.
Explanation:
Non competition clause (NCC) is a legal contract that binds one party to not work for or start a rival company (in the same trade) that will compete against the other party.
In this case, Jack said he would probably agree to sign a NCC if they paid him $100,000 more, but he never said he would sign for sure the NCC. So Jack can refuse to sign the NCC and reject the extra $100,000. The selling contract would still be valid, it was never stated that if no NCC was signed, then the contract would be dismissed.
