i'm gonna answer... i want to see where this goes
Answer:
rate = 6.54%
Explanation:
we need to find the rate at which a capital of 300,000 becomes 1,000,000 in a period of time of 19 years.
<u>So we build the following equation:</u>
![r=\sqrt[19]{1,000,000 \div 300,000}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Csqrt%5B19%5D%7B1%2C000%2C000%20%5Cdiv%20300%2C000%7D-1)
rate = 0.065417765 = 6.54% after rounding
This will be the rate my parent will require to generate 1,000,000 in 19 years with their current savings of 300,000.
Answer:
-$8,705
Explanation:
The computation of the Net present value is shown below
= Present value of all yearly cash inflows after applying discount factor + salvage value - initial investment
where,
The Initial investment is $110,000
All yearly cash flows would be
= Annual cost savings × PVIFA for 4 years at 12%
= $30,000 × 3.0373
= $91,119
Refer to the PVIFA table
And, the salvage value would be
= Salvage value × pvif for 4 years at 12%
= $16,000 × 0.636
= $10,176
The discount factor should be computed by
= 1 ÷ (1 + rate) ^ years
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $91,119 + $10,176 - $110,000
= -$8,705
Answer:
The sentence is unethical if there is a clear responsability on the mistakes. If the mistakes were made, and no one can be truly held accountable for that, then, the sentence is not unethical.
Explanation:
For example, if the government is corrupt, and officials actively commit embezzlement, the phrase "mistakes were made" is unethical because it is diverting the personal responsability of the corrupt officials.
But if for example, there is a volcano eruption, and the goverment tries its best to avoid casualties, but because of some involuntary mistakes some people still die, the phrase is not unethical because the mistakes were not voluntary and the consequences of those were not intended.
false: it means you dont have to agree with them but you have to respect their opinion
