I think it will be muscle contraction. Hope this helps! Mark brainly please!
<h2>
Answer: B. False</h2>
Explanation:
According to Bernoulli's principle:
<em>"In an ideal fluid (not viscous and without friction) that circulates through a closed conduit, the energy the fluid possesses remains constant along its path."
</em>
From there, Bernoulli deduced that the fluid pressure decreases when the flow rate increases. <u>And this has nothing to do with depth.
</u>
<u>
</u>
To understand it better:
In a fluid that circulates through a closed conduit (a pipe for example), it contains energy in two ways:
-Kinetic energy due to its <u>weigh</u>t and <u>speed.
</u>
-Potential energy in the form of <u>pressure.
</u>
Now, if the system has constant flow and the total energy (kinetic + potential) is also constant, <u>the energy is transformed every time the transverse area of the tube is modified.
</u>
It should be noted that by modifying this transverse area, the flow rate is also modified.
Therefore, <u>as the kinetic energy increases or decreases, this change is compensated by the decrease or increase in pressure</u> (potential energy), since the total energy of the system cannot be created or destroyed.
C. 76 I just did the question earlier
Answer:
No
Explanation:
From the analogy of the problem we are made to know that "a man standing on the earth can exert the same force with his legs as when he is standing on the moon".
This force he is exerting is due to his weight. If he can have the same weight on the earth and moon, therefore:
weight = mass x acceleration due gravity
His mass and acceleration due to gravity on both terrestrial bodies are the same.
So, his jump height will be the same on earth and on the moon.
In summary, we have been shown that his mass and the acceleration due to gravity on both planets are the same, therefore, his weight will also be the same. His jump height will also be same.
The intersection of logic and ethics concerns questions about the nature of moral reasoning. ... If one can successfully carry out such deductions, then moral reasoning is guided properly by consideration of nonmoral facts from which moral conclusions can be derived.
