All categories

3 years ago

You would cut the mirrpoix ingredients smaller when making a fish fumet than when making a beef stock because the

Business

2 answers:

jolli1 [7]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

D. fumet requires less cooking time.

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that are included with this question:

A. fish has a more delicate flavor.

B. beef stock cooks faster.

C. beef stock is darker.

D. fumet requires less cooking time.

The main reason why the mirrpoix ingredients are smaller when making a fish fumet than when making a beef stock is because fish fumet requires less cooking time. Fish cooks much faster, and if the ingredients were cut large in the way that they are for a beef stock, there would not be enough time for the stock to acquire all the flavor that it should get from the rest of the ingredients.

Amanda [17]3 years ago

4 0

I would suppose that it is because the beef stock wouldn't take as long to cook if you cut it smaller.

You might be interested in

For a single-server queueing system, which of the following is TRUE? A high utilization factor will result in a system that perf

ankoles [38]

Answer:

II only. A high utilization factor will result in a system that performs poorly is TRUE for a single-server queueing system. As it states that when designing a single-server queueing system, beware that giving a relatively high utilization factor (workload) to the server provides surprisingly poor measures of performance for the system.

True that queueing models enable finding an appropriate balance between the cost of service and the amount of waiting.

Explanation: RATE BRAINLIEST PLEASE

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following balance sheet equations is INCORRECT? A. Assets minus Current liabilities = Longminusterm liabilities

Kipish [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

This balance sheet equation is incorrect, Assets minus Current liabilities = Longminusterm liabilities

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the weaknesses of the cash payback approach? A. It uses accrual-based accounting numbers B. It ignores the time value o

Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

D. Both (B) and (C) are true

Explanation:

Cash payback approach is helpful to know the number of years, project would take to recover the initial investment. It could be calculated by dividing initial investment by cash flow per year. It is very simple and easy approach to compare projects and find number of years to recover the initial investment. The most serious weekness of cash payback approach is, it ignore the time value for the money, it also ignore project profitablity and project`s return on investment. As according to cash payback approach, it consider projects with short payback time as profitable and thus ignore useful life of alternative projects.

7 0

2 years ago

Samantha believes in interference theory. What does she MOST likely believe? A. Past information can get in the way of learning

Alex787 [66]

Answer:

A: "Past information can get in the way of learning new things."

7 0

2 years ago

The perfectly competitive firm's short-run supply curve is the Group of answer choices upward-sloping portion of its average tot

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Portion of its marginal cost curve that lies above its average variable cost curve.

Explanation:

This is explained to be the portion of its marginal cost curve because marginal gross benefits exceeds marginal cost, the firm can earn greater profits by increasing its output.

These profits are been maximized by choosing to supply the level of output where its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost. When this revenue is below the said marginal cost, money is lost, and consequently, it must reduce its output. Profits are however utilized when the firm chooses the level of output where its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost.

4 0

3 years ago