It depends on size and brand they can very from 3.99-30.00
Answer:
b) has sunk costs of exist6,000.
Explanation:
The cost which already been incurred and does not effect the decision being made. This cost is prospective cost. It can be avoided in decision making process.
Sunk Cost
Upgradation of Equipment = $6,000
Other cost are the routine costs which incur every year and future cost which is expected to be incur.
Answer:
The least important is the Option A "The price of a competitor's output". It has no influence in the decision of the manager about the inputs in the production process. The choice of inputs will depend on the technology, prices of the inputs and their marginal productivities.
Explanation:
The least important is the Option A "The price of a competitor's output". It has no influence in the decision of the manager about the inputs in the production process. The choice of inputs will depend on the technology, prices of the inputs and their marginal productivities.
Option B: The technology of the production process could affect the decision about the inputs employed because they are closely related.
Option C: The marginal productivity affect the decision about the inputs because it determines how the productivity can be maximized.
Option D: The prices of the inputs affect the decision because low price inputs (related with their marginal productivity) will be prefer to the high price inputs.
Answer:
(a) future value = $2041396.79
(b) future value = $862308.06
(c) financially suggest to invest early so that here amount fetch maximum returns
Explanation:
given data
rate = 9%
solution
when we invest = $100,000
time t = 35 year
so we get here future value FV
FV = Present value ×
...................1
FV = $100,000 ×
FV = $2041396.79
and
when time will be 25 year
future value will be
FV = Present value ×
.................2
Fv = $100,000 ×
FV = $862308.06
and
we can see difference is large because of the compounding effect
so the financially suggest to invest early so that here amount fetch maximum returns