All categories

3 years ago

How to factorised quadraticsin simple form thank you

Mathematics

1 answer:

photoshop1234 [79]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

ax²+ bx + c = 0

Step-by-step explanation

Multiplying (x+4) and (x−1) together (called Expanding) gets x2 + 3x − 4 :

expand vs factor quadratic

So (x+4) and (x−1) are factors of x2 + 3x − 4

Just to be sure, let us check:

(x+4)(x−1) = x(x−1) + 4(x−1)

= x2 − x + 4x − 4

= x2 + 3x − 4 yes

Yes, (x+4) and (x−1) are definitely factors of x2 + 3x − 4

You might be interested in

Please help with math question! This question is stressing me out (View Image)

TEA [102]

To find the volume of this one we need to break it down
now i see half of a cylinder and rectangle:)
but first lets find the volume of the rectangle...
In order to find the Volume of a rectangle we need to use this formula...
Length x width x height
in this case...
length = 10in
width = 6 in
height = 8in
lets solve:)
10 x 6 x 8 = 480
or we write it like this
480in³

now time to find the volume of the half cylinder:)
But first lets remember the volume for a cylinder
Volume = $\pi r^{2} h$
So lets find our measurements
$\pi$ = 3.14
r² = 5² or 25
h = 6
so lets plug in our values just like our formula said:)
3.14 x 25 x 6
now lets easily solve
3.14 x 25 x 6 = 471
now since we found an entire cylinder and we only want half of a cylinder lets divide our answer in half
471 ÷ 2 = 235.5
so we write it like this 235.5units³
But we have to add both of our multiples together so lets do that
Volume of rectangle = 480in³
volume of half sphere = 235.5units³
480 + 235.5 = 715.5
answer = 715.5units³
I hope this helped and everyone learned something new
anyways don't forget to
MARK ME BRAINLIEST! :D

3 0

3 years ago

You roll a 6 sided dice what is the probability of rolling a number greater than two and then rolling a number less than three

Alexandra [31]

First answer is 4 chances and second answer is 2 chances

5 0

4 years ago

Please HELP!! ILL GIVE BRAINLEST! QUCIK PLEASE HELP!!

Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

d. linear; $25/hour

Step-by-step explanation:

From looking at the graph, we have that renting for 2 hours costs $50, for 4 hours costs $100, for 6 hours costs $150, and for 8 hours costs $200. To find out whether the quantities described in the table are linear, we have to see if there is a constant rate of change of price.

For hour 2 to hour 4, we can see that the price increases by $50. This is the same for hour 4 to hour 6 and hour 6 to hour 8. For every 2 hour time interval, the price increases by $50. Therefore, there is a constant rate of change and the quantities described in the table are linear.

Now we have to find the constant rate of change per hour. We know that the price increases by $50 every 2 hours, so, by dividing both the hours and price increase by 2, the price increases by $25 per hour. So the constant rate of change is $25/hour.

Linear. $25/hour

Answer choice d.

I hope you find my answer and explanation to be helpful. Happy studying.

6 0

3 years ago

Pleaseeee helpppp !!!!!!!! Will mark Brianliest !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Goryan [66]

Answer:

I think you're supposed to add all the fives together. That is what MY teacher taught me to do :/

Step-by-step explanation:

The shape is a square that is tilted and looks like a rhombus. Just add the 5's together.

4 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!This is joshs solution for the equation x^2-6x-7=0: x^2-6x-7=0

iren [92.7K]

Answer:

no. see below

Step-by-step explanation:

This much of Josh's working is correct:

x^2-6x=7

x^2-6x+9=7+9

(x-3)^2=16

At this point Josh apparently overlooked the fact that he needed to take the square root of both sides of the equation. Had he done that, he would have ...

x -3 = ±4

x = 3+4 . . . or . . . 3 -4

x = 7 or -1

_____

Josh reported values of x that would match ...

x -3 = ±16

He violated the equal sign by taking the square root on the left, and multiplying by ±1 on the right. Doing different operations on the two sides of the equation will mean the value of x is changed to something other than what you're looking for.

4 0

3 years ago