The question is incomplete:
If you see that gasoline costs $1.70 in Georgia and $3.40 in California, you can conclude that gasoline is twice as expensive in California as in Georgia. This conclusion from this comparison reflects the function of money as a:
-store of value
-an object with a value that varies sharply from one place to another
-medium of exchange
-unit of account
Answer:
Unit of account
Step-by-step explanation:
-Store of value refers to something that can be kept for a period of time and maintains its value in the future.
-An object with a value that varies sharply from one place to another means that products can have different prices in different places.
-Medium of exchange refers to an object with an standard value that allows you to purchase goods or services.
-Unit of account refers to a numerical unit that allows you to compare the value of products and services.
According to this, the answer is that this conclusion from this comparison reflects the function of money as a unit of account because it indicates that money works as a unit that you can use to compare the value of products, in this case the price of gasoline in different places.
Answer:
Two other points: (2, 4) (6, 4)
Step-by-step explanation:
A line with a slope = 0 is a horizontal line [with a y-intercept of (0, <em>b</em>)], given by the linear equation, <em>y</em> = 4<em>. </em>This means that the y-coordinate will always equal to 4, regardless of its corresponding x-coordinate. Basically, we could choose any x-coordinate to pair with the y-coordinate of 4.
I chose the ordered pairs, (2, 4) and (6, 4).
Attached is a screenshot of the graphed linear equation, y = 4.
f(x) + n - shift a graph of f n units up
f(x) - n - shift a graph of f n units down
f(x + n) - shift a graph of f n units left
f(x - n) - shift a graph of f n units right.
f(x) = x³, g(x) = (x - 2)³ - 3 = f(x - 2) - 3
2 units right and 3 units down.
This is a conversion problem..
<span>1 cm = 0.01 m
</span>
so 150 cm would be 1,50
So it's D.<span>1.50 m</span>³
Based on the current income to Frenza, and the proposed expansion amount, the net income and return on equity for the three options are:
Don't Expand:
- Net income = $100,000.
- Return on equity = 25%.
Debt financing:
- Net income = $137,200.
- Return on equity = 34.3%.
Equity financing:
- Net income = $150,000.
- Return on equity = 26.8%.
<h3>What happens if Frenza doesn't expand?</h3>
Net income will remain at $100,000.
Return on equity would be:
= Net income / Equity
= 100,000 / 400,000
= 25%
<h3>What happens if Frenza uses debt financing?</h3>
Income goes to $150,000.
Net income:
= Income - interest
= 150,000 - (8% x 160,000)
= $137,200
Return on equity:
= 137,200 / 400,000
= $34.3%.
<h3>What happens if Frenza uses equity financing?</h3>
Income goes to $150,000.
No interest payment so net income is $150,000.
Return on equity:
= 150,000 / (400,000 + 150,000 new equity)
= 26.8%
Find out more on return on equity at brainly.com/question/1427854.
