A2-20-3b= quick answer please using pemdas

ABCD is a rectangle. The length of BD is 8 units, and m angle ABD is 67°. The length of AC is units, and m angle CDB is °.

Marina86 [1]

See the attached picture to better understand the problem
we know that
in rectangle ABCD
AB=CD
and
AD=BC
therefore
the triangle ACD and triangle ABC are congruent
so
BD=AC
BD=8 units

the answer part a) is
BD= 8 units

Part b) Find angle CBD

we know that
∠ABD+∠CBD=90°---------> by complementary angles
so
∠CBD=90-∠ABD-----> 90-67----> 23°
∠CBD=23°

the answer Part b) is
∠CBD=23 degrees

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The formula that describes an object's motion is given by s=ut+1/2at^2, where s is the distance traveled, u is the initial veloc

victus00 [196]

None of the offered choices is correct.

The correct equation is
.. a = (2s -2ut)/t^2 . . . . . . . . parentheses are required

4 0

3 years ago

Cube M has an edge length of

jeka57 [31]

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

6*(8*2)^2/(6*8^2)=2^2=4

3 0

3 years ago

You want to make an angle measuring 35° by marking an arc on the perimeter of a disk with a diameter of 16 inches and drawing li

Margaret [11]

The arc length is given by
.. s = rθ . . . . . . θ is the central angle in radians
.. = (8 in)*(35/180*π)
.. ≈ 4.9 in

_____
A disk 16 inches in diameter has a radius of 8 inches.

6 0

3 years ago

According to the US Bureau of labor statistics, 7% of US female workers between 16 and 24 years old are paid at the minimum wage

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Decision rule

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

Conclusion

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The percentage of US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is $k_o =$ 7% = 0.07

The sample size is $n = 500$

The number paid minimum wage or less is x = 42

The significance level is $\alpha =$ 5% = 0.05

Now the probability of getting a US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is mathematically represented as

$\= k = \frac{x}{n}$

substituting value

$\= k = \frac{42}{500}$

$\= k = 0.084$

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

$z = \frac{\= k - k_o}{\sqrt{\frac{k_o(1-k_o)}{n} } }$

substituting value

$z = \frac{0.084 - 0.07}{\sqrt{\frac{0.07 (1-0.07)}{500} } }$

$z = 1.23$

Now the Decision rule is stated as

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

So the conclusion will be

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

4 0

4 years ago