Answer:
No this is not a function.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is not a function because some of the x-values repeat, which is not how a function works. For this to be a function, each x-value would have to be different. In this case, the 4 and 5 repeat in the x-values.
If this answer is correct, please make me Brainliest!
Answer: OPTION D.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
The complete exercise is: "Which arrangement shows
, 3.7,
, and 3.89 in order from least to greatest?"</h3><h3>
</h3>
Convert from mixed numbers to decimal numbers.
The steps to do this, are the following:
1. You must divide the numerator of the fraction by the denominator.
2. Then you must add the quotient obtained to the whole number part.
Applying this procedure, you get that:


Now that you have all the numbers in decimal form, you can order from least to greatest:

Therefore, you can conclude that the correct arrangement is:

Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The point has a high leverage
Step-by-step explanation:
The point has a high leverage as it would act as an infinitesimal point that will have a very huge/drastic impact on the fit of the model, and this impact can be seen in such ways as listed below :
- Smaller coefficient of determination
- Higher sum of squares error
removing this point will eliminate these drastic impact and make the correlation to be better.