All categories

3 years ago

Select all the statements regarding electric field line drawings that are correct.

Physics

1 answer:

Sophie [7]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

All statement are correct.

Explanation:

1. Electric field lines are the same thing as electric field vectors, electric field are mathematically vectors quantity. These vectors point in the direction in which a positive test charge would move.

2. Electric field line drawings allow you to determine the approximate direction of the electric field at a point in space. Yes it is correct tangent drawn at any point on these lines gives the direction of electric filed at that point.

3. The number of electric field lines that start or end at a charged particle is proportional to the magnitude of charge on the particle, is a correct statement.

4.The electric field is strongest where the electric field lines are close together, again a correct statement as relative closeness of field lines indicate a stronger strength of electric field.

Hence we can say that all the statement are correct.

You might be interested in

What is a galvanic cell??

Kobotan [32]

Its an electrochemical cell that derives electrical energy from spontaneous redox reactions taking place within the cell.

8 0

3 years ago

The first PCS technology used a form of time division multiplexing called ____. a. Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) b. Gl

salantis [7]

Answer:

A. Time Division multiple Access (TDMA)

Explanation:

Time-division multiple access (TDMA) is a channel access method for shared-medium networks

It allows several users to share the same frequency channel by dividing the signal into different time slots. The users transmit in rapid succession, one after the other, each using its own time slot.

3 0

2 years ago

A single-phase electrical load draws 600KVA at 0.6 power factor lagging. a) Find the real and reactive power absorbed by the loa

Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

(a). The reactive power is 799.99 KVAR.

(c). The reactive power of a capacitor to be connected across the load to raise the power factor to 0.95 is 790.05 KVAR.

Explanation:

Given that,

Power factor = 0.6

Power = 600 kVA

(a). We need to calculate the reactive power

Using formula of reactive power

$Q=P\tan\phi$ ...(I)

We need to calculate the $\phi$

Using formula of $\phi$

$\phi=\cos^{-1}(Power\ factor)$

Put the value into the formula

$\phi=\cos^{-1}(0.6)$

$\phi=53.13^{\circ}$

Put the value of Φ in equation (I)

$Q=600\tan(53.13)$

$Q=799.99\ kVAR$

(b). We draw the power triangle

(c). We need to calculate the reactive power of a capacitor to be connected across the load to raise the power factor to 0.95

Using formula of reactive power

$Q'=600\tan(0.95)$

$Q'=9.94\ KVAR$

We need to calculate the difference between Q and Q'

$Q''=Q-Q'$

Put the value into the formula

$Q''=799.99-9.94$

$Q''=790.05\ KVAR$

Hence, (a). The reactive power is 799.99 KVAR.

(c). The reactive power of a capacitor to be connected across the load to raise the power factor to 0.95 is 790.05 KVAR.

8 0

3 years ago

A rocket burns fuel to create hot gases that explode violently out of the rocket engine. This explosion creates thrust. Thrust i

Lerok [7]

Answer:

Thrust due to fuel consumption must overcome gravitational force from the Earth to send the rocket up into space.

Explanation:

From the concept of Escape Velocity, derived from Newton's Law of Gravitation, definition of Work, Work-Energy Theorem and Principle of Energy Conservation, which is the minimum speed such that rocket can overcome gravitational forces exerted by the Earth, and according to the Tsiolkovski's Rocket Equation, which states that thrust done by the rocket is equal to the change in linear momentum of the rocket itself, we conclude that thrust due to fuel consumption must overcome gravitational force from the Earth to send the rocket up into space.

5 0

2 years ago

An object that has what acting on it acts as if there were no forces acting on it at all

Mumz [18]

Either no forces or a balanced group of forces
(not a group of "balanced forces"; there's no such thing)

3 0

3 years ago