It depends on what you mean by "what can be used", you can use a protractor or ruler since it's a line segment. OR you can use the formula a^ + b^ = c^ to find out all the measurements.......

If you still can't find it, then, you can try to find the other measurements around that specific line segments. And it DEPENDS on what you choose to find the length of this segment.

( There's no picture on my screen, so I'm guessing that you didn't put any.. )

Well, I hope this can help you :3

STAY SAFE!! :)

6 0

3 years ago

Find an equation for those points P such that the distance from P to A(0, 1, 2) is equal to the distance from P to B(6, 4, 2). W

suter [353]

Answer: The required equation for points P is $4x+2y=17.$

Step-by-step explanation: We are give two points A(0, 1, 2) and B(6, 4, 2).

To find the equation for points P such that the distance of P from both A and B are equal.

We know that the distance between two points R(a, b, c) and S(d, e, f) is given by

$RS=\sqrt{(d-a)^2+(e-b)^2+(f-c)^2}.$

Let the point P be represented by (x, y, z).

According to the given information, we have

$PA=PB\\\\\Rightarrow \sqrt{(x-0)^2+(y-1)^2+(z-2)^2}=\sqrt{(x-6)^2+(y-4)^2+(z-2)^2}\\\\\Rightarrow x^2+y^2-2y+1+z^2-4z+4=x^2-12x+36+y^2-8y+16+z^2-4z+4~~~~~~~[\textup{Squaring both sides}]\\\\\Rightarrow -2y+1=-12x-8y+52\\\\\Rightarrow 12x+6y=51\\\\\Rightarrow 4x+2y=17.$

Thus, the required equation for points P is $4x+2y=17.$

8 0

3 years ago

1) The number √ , where n is a prime number is

Firlakuza [10]

It is an irrational number

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Using complete sentences, write an indirect proof proving that if x=30, then 3/4x+5≠20 (3/4 being three over four)

WARRIOR [948]

hypothesis :-
if x=30, then 3/4x+5≠20
let Q:- x=30 P:- 3/4x+5≠20
we need to prove if Q then P (Q →P)

proof :-
lets assume 34x+5=20 is true
now x=30
so
3/4(30)+5=27.5 ≠20
which is a contradiction

proved ^

8 0

3 years ago