The answer to this question would be
a. empty stomach.
Hunger naturally caused by the decreased blood glucose level, so eating sugar will lessen it. But it also can be induced by an empty stomach. There is a receptor in the stomach that detect whether it is a stretch (mean that there is something inside it). Lack of stretch can cause it to send a signal that will result in hunger.Explanation:
you've most likely practised<span> gnawing, painful feelings in your </span>abdomen<span> at some </span>purpose<span>, </span>in the higher<span> left </span>aspect<span> of your abdomen. These </span>are usually referred to as<span> hunger pangs. Hunger pangs, or hunger pains, </span>are<span> caused by </span>sturdy<span> contractions of the </span>abdomen once<span> it’s empty. This uncomfortable sensation </span>is usually among<span> hunger, or </span>the will<span> to eat.</span>
<span>Despite being </span>known as<span> “hunger” pangs, these pains don’t </span>continuously<span> indicate </span>a really got to<span> eat.</span>
Whole body: High blood pressure, Swelling of hands and feet, Protein in urine
Also common: blurred vision, headache, nausea, swelling in extremities, weight gain
C.economic influences is the correct answer I hope this helps
The correct answer is: C. Ordering a salad instead of a burger at lunch
From the options listed above, ordering a salad instead of a burger at lunch, is the best example of practicing delayed gratification rather than acting on an impulse. When you crave a burger (an unhealthier food choice), but order a salad instead (a less palatable, yet much healthier food choice), you are delaying gratification you would obtain from a burger, and showing restraint by not acting on your impulse to eat a burger. Restraint and impulse control indicate maturity, emotional stability and overall better life outcomes, compared to acting impulsively and opting for immediate gratification.
