Answer:
16.2 cents
Explanation:
Given that a homeowner consumes 260 kWh of energy in July when the family is on vacation most of the time.
Where Base monthly charge of $10.00. First 100 kWh per month at 16 cents/kWh. Next 200 kWh per month at 10 cents/kWh. Over 300 kWh per month at 6 cents/kWh.
For the first 100 kWh:
16 cent × 100 = 1600 cents = 16 dollars
Since 1 dollar = 100 cents
For the remaining energy:
260 - 100 = 160 kwh
10 cents × 160 = 1600 cents = 16 dollars
The total cost = 10 + 16 + 16 = 42 dollars
Note that the base monthly of 10 dollars is added.
The cost of 260 kWh of energy consumption in July is 42 dollars
To determine the average cost per kWh for the month of July, divide the total cost by the total energy consumed.
That is, 42 / 260 = 0.1615 dollars
Convert it to cents by multiplying the result by 100.
0.1615 × 100 = 16.15 cents
Approximately 16.2 cents
Answer:
The perceived economic impact of CO2 generated per year by lighting sstem is $8164.67.
Explanation:
The CO2 requirement for the plant is:
Amount of CO2 per year = (2.4 lb / KWh)(300,000 KWh)
Amount of CO2 per year = (720000 lb)(1 ton/ 2204.62 lb)
Amount of CO2 per year = 326.59 ton
The perceived economic impact of CO2 generated per year will then be:
Economic Impact = ($25 / ton)(326.59 ton)
<u>Economic Impact = $8164.67</u>
The x-ray beam's penetrating power is regulated by kVp (beam quality). Every time an exposure is conducted, the x-rays need to be powerful (enough) to sufficiently penetrate through the target area.
<h3>How does kVp impact the exposure to digital receptors?</h3>
The radiation's penetration power and exposure to the image receptor both increase as the kVp value is raised.
<h3>Exposure to the image receptor is enhanced with an increase in kVp, right?</h3>
Due to an increase in photon quantity and penetrability, exposure at the image receptor rises by a factor of five of the change in kVp, doubling the intensity at the detector with a 15% change in kVp.
To know more about kVp visit:-
brainly.com/question/17095191
#SPJ4
Answer: LED have the lowest cost of operation.
Explanation:
If we ignore the initial procurement cost of the items the operational cost of any device consuming electricity is given by
Among the three item's LED consumes the lowest power to give the same level of brightness as compared to the other 2 item's thus LED's shall have the lowest operational cost.
Answer:
The company found the cost of the required photovoltaic cells too expensive.
Explanation:
Solar energy can be used as an alternative source of supply for fuel. Solar energy is a renewable source of energy, that is it keeps on replenishing every day. Also solar energy does not require a lot of maintenance.
The cost required is starting a solar system is very high because one needs to buy solar panel, photovoltaic cells for batteries, inverters and so on.
From the question, the company decided against solar energy for the time being. This means that probably in the future they might consider it. Therefore it is as a result of the economic situation of the company that they have not set up a solar system because the cost of the required photovoltaic cells too expensive.
